Skip to main content

iRubric: Discussion/Writing Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Discussion/Writing Assignment A rubric designed to grade discussion/writing assignments. Rubric Code: X4569W By csoltero Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Reading Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Discussion/Writing Rubric
	beginning 6.25 pts	developing 12.5 pts	accomplished 18.75 pts	Outstnading 25 pts
Content/Substance/Knowledge 25 pts Student demonstrates proficiency of the subject matter in the assignment. Student understands and can explain all major points. Assignment shows depth in student's understanding and ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications.	beginning The writing fails to meet the minimum requirements of the assignment. It offers little insight into the subject and has serious flaws in logic and omissions in evidence.	developing The writing meets the minimum requirements of the assignment. It offers insight into the subject through basic logic and the presentation of ideas based on some evidence.	accomplished The writing clearly goes beyond the minimum requirements of the assignment. It attempts to engage the reader through originality and presentation of complex ideas.	Outstnading The writing engages the reader with an original approach to the subject. It may encompass conflicting ideas and inspires the reader to contemplate the relationship of complex ideas.
Critical Thinking & Thesis 25 pts Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical manner.	beginning The writing may need a more clearly articulated thesis and/or appropriate related subordinate ideas. Fuzzy logic may be evident and adequate supporting evidence is lacking.	developing The writing has a clear thesis and related subordinate ideas supported by clear thinking and appropriate evidence. Logical arguments may be one-sided or incomplete.	accomplished The writing has a clearly articulated thesis supported by appropriate evidence and sound logic. Minor gaps in logic and argument may appear.	Outstnading The writing has a clearly articulated original thesis and subordinate ideas supported by reliable and relevant evidence based on original research.
Organization & Support 25 pts The introduction provides a high-level overview about the purpose of the assignment (what the student is talking about and hopes to accomplish by presenting the information); as well as being a smooth flowing "highlight" of the content that the student is going to address. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current/world views in the assignment.	beginning The writing is noticeably lacking in organization. There is no clear introduction or conclusion and ideas are neither carefully nor fully developed. Supporting evidence is clearly lacking.	developing The writing demonstrates rudimentary organization and logical structure, but ideas may be more fully developed and supported by more appropriate evidence.	accomplished The writing is organized logically and flows well. An introduction and conclusion are evident, but transitions may be smoother.	Outstnading The writing flows smoothly and logically from a well-defined thesis. It contains an appropriate introduction, conclusion, and smooth transitions.
Presentation, Grammar & Mechanics 25 pts Student demonstrates command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Student presents a thorough understanding of word usage. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic assignment. References are properly cited and Chicago/Turabian Format is followed.	beginning The writing exhibits substantial errors in grammar and style so that the basic ideas are lost. Sources are overly quoted and /or not adequately documented nor cited. Zero sources and/or citations.	developing The writing could benefit from additional proofreading, as some errors impede the flow of the reading. Sources are documented and cited but need to show greater consistency. 1 or 2 sources cited and/or quoted but less than the 3 required	accomplished The writing may exhibit a few minor errors in grammar or style, but do impair the flow of the reading. Most quoted material is properly documented and cited. Three reference sources are present.	Outstnading The writing is free of grammatical, proofreading, and stylistic errors. All quoted material is properly documented and cited.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Reading

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Social Sciences rubrics

More Reading rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178