Skip to main content

iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Public Service Announcement rubric

home » rubrics » iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Public Service Announcement rubric » 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Missouri FCCLA Public Service Announcement 
Missouri FCCLA Digital Stories for Change
This rubric is for the Missouri FCCLA state contest, Public Service Announcement. The contest is open to Missouri FCCLA members only. Information found at www.mofccla.org
Rubric Code: X38B77
By MoFCCLA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric MoFCCLA Public Service Announcement
Participants promote FCCLA to a selected audience through use of digital video. Team members may choose their selected audience, message theme, and creative concepts.
 

0 pts


1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts

Theme
If project did not use one of the required themes, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 10 point deducation, to be deducted from the final score. Themes must be either "Discover the Magic of Leadership," "Grasp Greatness," or "65 Years of Leadership."
Time or Size Specification
If project did not meet the time specification, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 5 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score.
Target Audience
0.5 pts

(chosen by participant)
0 ( x 0.5 pts)

PSA does not appear to meet the target audience.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

PSA mostly appropriate for target audience.
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

PSA appropriate for target audience.
Project Identification Page
1 pts

Must be posted online for viewing, not part of the video.
0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Included but missing one or more requirements.
2 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 1 pts)

Includes participant name(s), school, city, state, FCCLA region, title of project, and target audience.
Use of FCCLA Planning Process
1 pts

A summary page of the planning process must be posted on the website or wiki.
0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

1 or 2 steps summarized. Planning process relationship to project is weak.
2 ( x 1 pts)

3 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are generally reflected in project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

4 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are seen in project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

All 5 steps summarized. Planning process completed and relates to project.
Introduction
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction missing.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction weak and audience is confused.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction developed but audience desires more information to become interested.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction is original and developed, audience is interested.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction is highly original and captivates audience completely.
Purpose and Focus
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Purpose and focus is missing.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Purpose and focus is weak and difficult to figure out.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Purpose and focus is implied, but fairly clear.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Establishes purpose early and maintains focus for most of presentation.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Establishes purpose early and maintains a clear focus throughout the presentation.
Content and Message
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

FCCLA not mentioned directly.
1 ( x 1 pts)

FCCLA message and content is weak and not persuasive.
2 ( x 1 pts)

FCCLA message and content is not fully developed.
3 ( x 1 pts)

FCCLA message and content is clear and convincing.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Provides excellent information about FCCLA.
Idea Organization
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas not organized, hard to follow, audience left confused by disorganization.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas lack coherence, consistency and flow, audience makes assumptions to follow.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas mostly coherent but not clearly supported in project flow, portions are hard to follow.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas mostly coherent and organized, project flow is easily followed.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas coherent and effectively organized, project flows seamlessly for audience.
Technical Quality
1 pts

Sound, Images, Editing
0 ( x 1 pts)

Sound and/or images are missing from project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Technical quality is of poor quality and distracts from project.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Technical quality if inconsistent and somewhat distracting.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Technical quality is adequate and supports the project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Technical quality is high and enhances total project.
Documentation
1 pts

Any music, photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used in the project must be properly cited and documented. Must follow copyright and must follow school district rules for student privacy and use of photographs or student work.
0 ( x 1 pts)

No information provided on copyright or source citations.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not cited.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not properly cited.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright statements and permissions are included, most sources are properly cited.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Work is original, or copyright statements and permissions are included, all sources are documented.
Creativity and Design
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No use of color, design, or effects to support the theme of the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Minimal use of color, design, effects distract from the theme. Originality is absent.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Minimal use of color, design, effects and original ideas. Theme not well supported.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Good use of color, design, effects and original ideas. Theme not well supported.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Excellent use of color, design, effects, and originality to maximize theme and ideas.
Text Communication
1 pts

The use of inappropriate music, graphics, or text will automatically disqualify the entry. Inappropriate matierals are those that are obscene, indecent, profane, or explicit.
0 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
1 ( x 1 pts)

Choice of text, words, or graphics does not enhance the project, contains many errors.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text, or graphic choices are appropriate but contain errors.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text, or graphic choices are good and support the project ideas
4 ( x 1 pts)

Word, text or graphic choices are powerful, vivid, and descriptive to audience.
Voice/Sound Communication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Is not relevant, does not create interest or added meaning, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow needs improvement.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Relevant to project but does not add meaning, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is acceptable.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Enriches the project, creates interest, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is above average.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Significantly enriches the project, creates appropriate mood/tone, quality of volume/diction/fluency/flow is high.
Ending
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Ending is abrupt, weak, or missing.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Ending somewhat developed but does not provide closure.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Ending meets average audience expectations.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Ending is creative and closes the project well.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Powerful and compelling ending.



Keywords:
  • Missouri, FCCLA, Public Service Announcement

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n60