Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Written case analysis assessment rubric

iRubric: Written case analysis assessment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Written case analysis assessment Written case analysis assessment Used for midterm exam and case write-ups when a students misses a class in 465B Rubric Code: X27X59 By yesenia Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Writing Grade Levels: (none)

Midterm case analysis
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts
Analysis 42.5 %
Issues identification 3 pts	Poor No key issues are identified	Fair Some key issues are identified	Good All key issues are identified
Issues analysis 3 pts	Poor The analysis of issues is shallow or contains major flaws	Fair The analysis of issues is mostly accurate, but lacking in depth OR The theoretical knowledge is not applied to the analysis or is applied inappropriately	Good The analysis of the issues is thoughtful, thorough, and appropriately applies theoretical knowledge and practical experience
Stakeholders 2 pts	Poor The situation is analyzed from the perspective of one stakeholder	Fair The situation is analyzed from the perspectives of some key stakeholders in the case	Good The situation is analyzed from the perspectives of all key stakeholders in the case
Alternatives 2 pts	Poor Recommends a course of action without identifying alternatives	Fair Identifies some alternative courses of action available to the protagonist but does not identify some important possibilities; AND/OR thoroughly analyzes some but not all identified alternatives	Good Identifies several alternative courses of action available to the protagonist and analyzes each alternative thoroughly
Recommendations 42.5 %
Appropriateness 2.5 pts	Poor The recommended course of action does not address any of the major issues of the case	Fair The recommended course of action is appropriate to address some but not all major issues of the case	Good The recommended course of action is appropriate to address the major issues of the case
Feasibility 2.5 pts	Poor It is not reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the recommendations	Fair It is reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the main recommendations	Good It is entirely reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the recommendations
Rigor 2.5 pts	Poor Recommendations are not linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND/OR The consequences of the recommendations are not anticipated	Fair Recommendations are in part linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND/OR Anticipated consequences of the recommendations are mentioned but not clearly explicated	Good Recommendations are thoroughly linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND Anticipated consequences of the recommendations are clearly explicated
Principled leadership 2.5 pts	Poor Recommendations for action reflect severe lack of understanding and/or application of principled leadership	Fair Recommendations for action reflect some understanding and/or application of principled leadership	Good Recommendations for action reflect thorough understanding and application of principled leadership
Written presentation 15 %
Clarity and persuasiveness 4 pts	Poor Unclear, confused, and unpersuasive articulation and explication of ideas.	Fair Somewhat clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.	Good Clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.
Grammar and syntax 2 pts	Poor Frequent or consistent improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.	Fair Occasional improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.	Good Proper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.
Spelling and typographical errors 1 pts	Poor More than three spelling or typographical errors	Fair One, two, or three spelling or typographical errors	Good No spelling or typographical errors
Formatting 1 pts	Poor No use of formatting to enhance the text.	Fair Modest use of bullet points, headings, and other formatting to structure the content, but not in a way that enhances its clarity.	Good Uses bullet points, heading, and other formatting to structure the content and enhance its clarity.
Length 2 pts	Poor The write-up is more than 20% too long	Fair The write-up is up to 20% too long	Good The length of the write-up is within the guidelines

Subjects:

Business

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n60