Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Bill of Rights Magazine Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Bill of Rights Magazine Project
Bill of Rights Magazine Project
The student will create Bill of Rights website.
Rubric Code:
X246444
By
moreilly24
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Magazine Pages
Excellent
10 pts
Good
8 pts
Fair
5 pts
Poor
2 pts
Presentation, Neatness and Clarity
Excellent
The website is creative, neat and appealing to the eye.
The student has no grammatical or spelling errors.
2 required pages are completed.
Good
One or two parts of the website are messy or unclear.
The students has little grammatical or spelling errors. (2 or less)
2 required pages are completed.
Fair
Three or four parts of the website are messy or unclear.
The student has few grammatical or spelling errors. (3 to 5 errors)
2 required pages are completed.
Poor
Five or six parts of the website are messy or unclear.
The student has many grammatical or spelling errors. (5 or more)
1.75 pages are completed.
Explanation of topic
Excellent
Very detailed.
Explanation is in the student's own words and is clearly stated.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.
Good
Partially detailed.
In student's own words and is mostly clear.
Demonstrates a understanding of the topic but is missing one key point.
Fair
A small portion is detailed.
In student's own words and some parts are unclear.
Demonstrates some understanding of the topic but is missing two or more key points.
Poor
Explanation of the topic is attempted but is missing important information.
In student's own words and is unclear.
Fails to demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Court Case Example
Excellent
Relevant court case
Accurate description of the court case.
*background info
*outcome
Clear connection made to group's topic.
Good
Relevant court case.
Accurate description of the court case.
*background info
*outcome
Mostly clear connection made to group's topic.
Fair
Relevant court case.
(Mostly) Accurate description of the court case.
*background info
*outcome
Partial connection to the group's topic.
Poor
Somewhat relevant court case.
Description of the court case. Missing major details.
Connection to the topic attempted but is unclear or inaccurate.
Current Event
Excellent
Summary of background event in student's own words. It includes all major elements of the story.
Current event's relevancy to topic is clearly explained by students.
Current event is properly cited.
Good
Summary of event is in student's own words. It includes all the major elements of the story.
Current event's relevancy to topic is explained by students. One connection is unclear or missing.
Source is cited.
Fair
Summary of event is in student's own words. It includes most of the major elements of the story.
Current event's relevancy to topic is only partially explained by students or 2-3 connections are unclear.
Source is cited.
Poor
Summary of event is in student's own words. It includes some of the major elements of the story but is missing 2 or more key points.
Current event's relevancy to topic is attempted but is unclear but is not successfully completed.
Exception
Excellent
Group gives a clear and accurate definition of an exception(s).
Group identifies and clearly explains one exception to their topic.
Good
Group gives a somewhat clear and accurate definition of an exception.
Group identifies one exception to their topic. The explanation is somewhat unclear.
Fair
Group gives a definition of an exception but is missing 1 clear point.
Group identifies one exception to their topic. The exception is unclear.
Poor
Group does not define an exception correctly.
Group attempts to identify an exception to their topic but it is inaccurate.
Student/Minor Protections
Excellent
Group gives clear explanation of how assigned right applies to students/minors
Group references a court case that clarified student/minor rights
Good
Group gives some explanation of rights are altered for students/minors
Case is added but may not be explained
Fair
Group shows very little research was done on how rights apply specifically to students/minors
No Court case referenced
Poor
Group is completely missing section on student/minor rights
Keywords:
Civics Constitution History BOR
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.