Skip to main content
iRubric: Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric

iRubric: Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric 
Experiment Poster
Rubric Code: WXXX998
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Experiment Poster
  Excellent

A - 90%

(N/A)

Good

B - 80%

(N/A)

Fair

C - 70%

(N/A)

Poor

D - 60%

(N/A)

Scientific Method Steps

Excellent

Scientific Method Steps are fully identified. Content is accurate, comprehensive, and well-supported. One can see every step clearly followed in the project.
Good

Scientific Method Steps are clearly seen and identified. Content is accurate and well-supported.
Fair

Scientific Method Steps are poorly incorporated. It is not clear whether or not student followed all the steps.
Poor

Scientific Method Steps are not included.
Hypothesis

Excellent

Hypothesis is clearly stated and project supports the testing of the hypothesis. Presentation clearly ties the hypothesis with the experiment design.
Good

Hypothesis is clearly stated and project supports the testing of the hypothesis.
Fair

Hypothesis is not clearly stated or well thought-out.
Poor

Hypothesis is not stated.
Experiment

Excellent

Experiment was scientifically done, and the variables clearly identified. Experiment is repeatable, and new experimental data supports the conclusion.
Good

Experiment was carefully done, and the variables are identified. Supporting data does not make the experimental procedure clear or repeatable.
Fair

Experiment was done but support information is lacking. Variables are not stated clearly, or are incomplete.
Poor

Experiment was hastily done, and lacks support data. Variables are not stated.
Observations

Excellent

Observations are based on experimental data, and are clearly presented. Student makes clear scientific observations that support the conclusion.
Good

Observations are based on experimental data, and are presented. More detail is needed to make a logical conclusion.
Fair

Observations are not supported by experimental data, or not clearly stated. Project jumps from experiment to conclusion.
Poor

Observations about the experiment are not stated.
Conclusion

Excellent

Conclusion is valid and logical. Conclusion is based on observations and clearly stated. Student identifies whether or not further research is needed.
Good

Conclusion is valid, logical, and based on observations. Conclusion is stated clearly.
Fair

Conclusion is stated but without adequate detail, or not based upon observations made.
Poor

Conclusion is not stated.
Presentation

Excellent

Reader can follow the scientific method easily. Graphics and support data are included in a logical way. The words are clearly and neatly lettered. Excellent job.
Good

Demonstrates good effort. Student put thought in how information would be presented, and the reader can follow the steps of the scientific method.
Fair

Demonstrates some effort. Some good content, bullet points, and graphics. Scientific method is there, but difficult to follow.
Poor

Effort is lacking. Minimal content, no bullet points, no graphics, mininal support information or not very neat.



Keywords:
  • Science Poster Evaluation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232