Skip to main content
iRubric: Multicultural project rubric

iRubric: Multicultural project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Multicultural project 
Speaking Assessment for ESL
Multicultural Project
Rubric Code: WXB7XCX
By destrada28
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Speaking
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

4 pts

Speaking-Pronunciacion/ Fluency

Excellent

Pronunciation and Fluidity in Speech are excellent with close to no mistakes made. Comprehension is easy.
Good

Pronounces most of the words correctly and speaks clearly but with a few mistakes. Comprehension is not affected by performance.
Fair

Mistakes are made regularly in pronunciation.
There is little fluidity in the speech. Comprehension is possible.
Poor

Pronunciation and lack of fluidity cause the presentation to be almost, if not completely incomprehensible.
Grammar use/ Vocabulary

Excellent

Appropriate usage of grammar and vocabulary very few grammatical mistakes were made. Easily comprehensible.
Good

Appropriately uses correct vocabulary and grammar most of the time. There are mistakes made, but comprehension is not affected.
Fair

Grammatical mistakes are regularly made. Vocabulary is lacking. Comprehension negatively affected.
Poor

Accuracy and Grammar use are lacking. Many mistakes are made. Comprehension is negatively affected and presentation is almost incomprehensible.
Presentation accuracy

Excellent

Completely covers topic, and gives details and information that allows the class to easily understand.
Good

Mostly covers all the details and information, leaving out only a few pieces of info.
Topic is understood.
Fair

Covers about half of the info available. Gives only enough detail that is negatively affects understanding but can still be understood somewhat.
Poor

Does not provide enough information and details to allow the class to understand the topic of the presentation. Fails to cover almost all important information.
Presentation dynamics

Excellent

Students interpretation of content is fully present. There is not a didactic support to read off the presentation. Student feel confiedent with the content and there is eye contact and interaction with judges all the time.
Good

There is eye contact with judges. Students use didactic support during the presentation but don´t rely on it.
Interpretation of the material is present.
Fair

There is some eye contact but there is a lack of interpretation. Students read most of the presentation.
Poor

Does not provide eye contact, and student reads the entire presentation out with little or non interpretation.
stand-Creativity

Excellent

Project has original and surprising elements. There are full expressions of what the culture is and the project fully expresses students´ pérsonality.
Good

There are many interesting original elements the demostrate the culture. Students´s personality is present.
Fair

There are some elements copied from internet or other teams. Students creativity is limited. student´s personality is not present or can´t be define.
Poor

Clearly lack of creativity. all the elements are very simple of copied. Lacks of student´s personality.
Aesthetics

Excellent

Project´s neatness is evident. Stand and all its elements are clean and organized. Correct use of space and originality of students´dress code is indisputable.
Good

Students stand´s neatness is present but there are some elements that could better placed. Students dress code doesn´t connect much with the purpose of the project.
Fair

There are elements that are absent in the stand or are falling down.
Stand looks unorganized and there a little connection of the project purpose to the student´s dress code.
Poor

Stands looks completely unorganize, elements are missing and students
didn´t follow a dress code.
Material use & team work

Excellent

Resources are an evident in the representation of the culture.
Students´s made all the elements of the presentation.
Classmates are present and respectufully supporting their classmates during the exposition. Collaboration is obvious.
Good

Some resources are missing. Students bought some of the elements of the presentation. Classmates are listening respectufully to the representation but there is few evidence of colaboration as team.
Fair

Resources are missing. Classmates are being disruptive to the presentation and there is not support to the classmates who are presenting.
Poor

Resources are missing and there is clearly evidence of the lack of participation of classmates. They are disruptive or not even present during the presentation.
Research- Geography

Excellent

Students have an obvious representation/ knowledge of the geograophy of the country. Elements describe weather, geographic diversity and main cities for turism.
Good

There is evidence that students know about the grographic diversity and weather. Some elements are represented and they used main cities as examples.
Fair

There is a lack of knowledge of greographic diversity but students represent some important cities.
Poor

There is not evidence of greographic knowledge, neither representations.
Gastronomy

Excellent

Project has an evident demostration of the gastronoic knowledge about the country. Students include more than one dish (physically) based on the diversity of the country regions.
Good

There is evidence of knowledge about gastronomic choices. Students brought only few dishes to represent the culture´s food.
Fair

There is evidence of knowledge about gastronomic choices in the contry. Not Physically present in the stand.
Poor

Lack of knowledge of the gastonomic choices. Not present in the stand.
Traditions and culture.

Excellent

There is a full knowledge about cultural traditions, holidays ,traditional outfits, art, music. Famous people/ personalities from that country are well represent it. Main language is presented ina creative way.
Good

Knowledge about cultural features, holidays and traditional outfits are presented but there are some elements missing.
Main langauge is represented.
Fair

There is a little knowledge or evidence about cultural traditions. Language is represented.
Poor

There is not clue about traditions and cultural content in the presentation.
Government and religion

Excellent

Presentation represents full undertanding about goverment type, political situation and religion practiced in the country . Students are aware of how religion affect or support other features of culture.
Students know about natural resources, type of money, international trades. Flag is present.
Good

There is limited knowledge about the political situation of the country. Some knowledge about the money type and resources is expressed.
Some religion components are present but not all.
Flag is present.
Fair

There is limited information about the political situation and government of the country. There is a lack of knowlegde about religion practices.
Flag is present.
Poor

No representaion of type of goverment and religion is present in the stand. Students have no idea about money type and no flag is exposed.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232