iRubric: Peer-Editing rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Peer-Editing Peer-Editing This rubric is to rate the quality of the edits suggested by the peer-editor. Rubric Code: WX3W535 By mmccoynf Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12, Graduate

Peer-Editing Rubric
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts
Timeliness	Poor The peer-editor submitted the peer-editing form more than one day late.	Fair The peer-editor submitted the peer-editing form one day late.	Good The peer-editor submitted the peer-editing form on time.
Completeness of Peer Rubric	Poor The peer-editor made an attempt to complete the peer rubric yet their were crucial components missing.	Fair The peer-editor completed most sections of the peer rubric.	Good The peer-editor completed the entire peer rubric.
Editing Quality	Poor Minimally addresses the following: 1) use of Active vs. Passive voice, 2) flow between topics (introduces old information first followed by new), and 3) sentence conciseness (omitting unnecessary words, use of simple subjects and words).	Fair Addresses two of the components from the following: 1) use of Active vs. Passive voice, 2) flow between topics (introduces old information first followed by new), and 3) sentence conciseness (omitting unnecessary words, use of simple subjects and words).	Good The peer-editor addresses all of the following: 1) use of Active vs. Passive voice, 2) flow between topics (introduces old information first followed by new), and 3) sentence conciseness (omitting unnecessary words, use of simple subjects and words).
Comments and Suggestions	Poor The peer-editor does not provide the writer with any comments or suggestions; or comments and suggestions are simplistic and/or incomplete.	Fair The peer-editor provides the writer with basic comments or suggestions for each section of the paper.	Good The peer-editor provides the writer with quality comments or suggestions for each section of the paper