Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Team Presentation Evaluation Form rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Rubric Code:
WX2WC4A
By
bnixon
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Excellent
200 pts
Good
170 pts
Average
150 pts
Poor
0 pts
Organization
20 %
Excellent
Consistently clear, concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow because of the organization.
Good
Consistently clear,
concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow
because of the organization.
Average
Not always clear or concise. Organization was adequate, but weak. Occasionally wandered and was sometimes difficult to follow.
Poor
Often unclear and disorganized, rambled too much. The presentation was confusing and difficult to follow.
Topic Knowledge
20 %
Excellent
Displayed an excellent grasp of the material. Demonstrated excellent mastery of content, application and implications. Excellent research depth
Good
Displayed a general grasp of the material. Demonstrated good mastery of content, application and implications. Good research depth.
Average
Displayed some grasp
of the material. Demonstrated adequate mastery of content, application and implications. Research not very deep.
Poor
Displayed a poor grasp of the material.
Demonstrated a superficial handling of content, application and implications. Little depth of research.
Visual Aids & Handouts
10 %
Excellent
Simple, clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Well coordinated with content, well designed, used very effectively. Excellent example of how to prepare and use good visual aids
Good
Usually clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Generally well coordinated with content, design was okay, generally used
effectively. Demonstrated
some understanding of how to use visual aids.
Average
Marginally acceptable,
too complex, crowded, difficult to read or interpret. Adequate coordination with
content. Used only
adequately. Showed little understanding of how to prepare and use visual aids.
Poor
Poor quality visual aids (or none), hard to read, technically inaccurate, poorly constructed. Poor
coordination with content. Used poorly. The presenters did not seem to know how to
prepare or use visual aids effectively.
Creativity
10 %
Excellent
Very creative and original. Imaginative design and use of materials. Novel
handouts, visual aids, or methods.
Good
Exhibited some originality and creativity.
Average
Routine treatment,
minimal thought given to originality or creativity.
Poor
Lacked creativity. Very ordinary and mundane.
Summary
10 %
Excellent
Clear, concise, major
points emphasized, clear recommendations, strong conclusion or call for action.
Good
Referred to main points, recommendations weak or missing, weak conclusion or call for action.
Average
Vague mention of major points, no recommendations, weak conclusion, weak or no call for action.
Poor
No summary, no
recommendations, no
conclusions, no call for action. "That's it."
Nonverbal Aspects
10 %
Excellent
Excellent stage presence. Confident, used notes well, at ease, excellent gestures, good audience attention, good eye contact.
Good
Good stage presence.
Fairly confident, used notes fairly well, good gestures,
acceptable audience
attention and eye contact.
Average
Adequate stage presence. Read parts,
fumbled with notes, several distracting mannerisms, minimal gestures, minimal eye contact, too many ums.
Poor
Poor stage presence.
Unprepared, awkward, shuffled papers, poor eye contact, lots of ums, turned from audience to read screens, shuffled feet, fidgeted.
"Choreography" of Team
20 %
Excellent
Smooth transitions between speakers in every case.
Good
Mostly smooth transitions between speakers.
Average
Awkward transitions between speakers.
Poor
Poor gestures & transitions between speakers.
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.