iRubric: WWII Virtual Museum Rubric

-At least 2 required rooms
-Design looks professional
-Layout is appropriate for the topic
-Images and videos are placed intentionally and meaningfully; there is a flow to their order

-2 required rooms
-Design looks almost professional
-Layout is appropriate for topic but can have more details.
-Images and videos appear to be organized; there appears to be a flow in the order of images

-1 room
-Design is minimal
-Layout could use more attention to details
-Images and videos are random; there does not appear to be an flow to the order

-1 room
-Poorly designed
-No attention to detail
-Images and videos are random and the order causes confusion

-Descriptions are well thought out and meaningfully supports the exhibit.
-No grammatical errors. -Information is at the advanced level; it goes above and beyond common knowledge to demonstrate thorough understanding of the topic
-Strong paragraph structure
-Descriptions are included for every image and video.

-Descriptions are thought out and enhance the exhibit
-No major grammatical errors.
-Information adequately supports images.
-Good paragraph structure
-Descriptions are included for most images and videos.

-Description is simple but accurate.
- Some grammatical errors. -Information supports images at times.
-Weak paragraph structure
-Descriptions are missing from some images and videos.

-Description is oversimplified and has several inaccuracies
-There are several grammatical errors
-The information does not consistently support images.
-Not in complete paragraphs
-Most images and videos do not have descriptions

-Used class time effectively and both partners were on task the entire time.
-Communicated clearly with one another and worked out issues or problems together
-Both contributed equally to each stage of the project.

-Mostly used class time effectively and both partners were on task the majority of the time.
-Communicated respectfully with one another and tried to work out issues or problems together
-Each partner contributed almost equally to each stage of the project.

-Used class time effectively some of the time but either both/one was off task some of the time.
-Communication was not very clear with one another and still had issues that were unresolved.
-There was unequal share of several stages of the project.

-Did not class time effectively; both or one was off task the majority of the time.
-Were distracting to other groups
-Communication was disrespectful and/or ideas were not clearly relayed or accepted.
-Issues were not worked out together
-Unequal share of the majority of the project.