Skip to main content
iRubric: BPSGT Funny Shaped Building rubric

iRubric: BPSGT Funny Shaped Building rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BPSGT Funny Shaped Building 
BPSGT Funny Shaped Building
Create a funny-shaped building in which your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside. For example, Red Robin might be shaped like a red robin, the Rehder Hearing Clinic may have a giant ear on the facade, etc. Your funny-shaped building must also include appropriate landscaping based on the Billings business' current location.
Rubric Code: WCW8A3
By het1Bil
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric BPSGT Funny Shaped Building
  EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

(N/A)

EXEMPLARY

4 pts

GOOD

3 pts

FAIR

2 pts

UNACCEPTABLE

1 pts

DID NOT COMPLETE

0 pts

DRAWING

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes at least 6 architectural features with labels. Also included is a written paragraph detailing how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside.
GOOD

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 4-5 architectural features with labels. Also included is a written paragraph detailing how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside.
FAIR

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 2-3 architectural features with labels. Also included is a written description detailing how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside.
UNACCEPTABLE

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 1 architectural feature with labels. Also included is a written description detailing how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Lack of neatness and accuracy make this drawing illegible. No architectural features are labeled. Missing a written description detailing how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Constructed a funny-shaped building whose design appropriately reflects the name of a Billings business, or the items sold inside, and demonstrates at least 6 architectural features.
GOOD

Constructed a funny-shaped building whose design appropriately reflects the name of a Billings business, or the items sold inside, and demonstrates 4-5 architectural features.
FAIR

Constructed a funny-shaped building whose design appropriately reflects the name of a Billings business, or the items sold inside, and demonstrates 2-3 architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

Constructed a funny-shaped building whose design appropriately reflects the name of a Billings business, or the items sold inside, and demonstrates 1 architectural feature.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Did not construct a funny-shaped building whose design appropriately reflects the name of a Billings business or the items sold inside.
MATERIALS

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Appropriate, realistic materials were selected. Measurements are relative to scale; construction is neat and accurate.
GOOD

Many appropriate, realistic materials were selected. Measurements are relative to scale; some inaccuracies with construction.
FAIR

Some appropriate, realistic materials were selected. Some inaccuracies with measurements relative to scale and/or inaccuracies with construction are observable.
UNACCEPTABLE

Few appropriate materials were selected. Numerous inaccuracies with measurements relative to scale and/or inaccuracies with construction are obvious.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
LANDSCAPING

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and used to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape based on the Billings business' current location.
GOOD

Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape based on the Billings business' current location.
FAIR

Few appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the Billings business' current location.
UNACCEPTABLE

Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Landscaping was not evident.
QUALITY

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Great care was taken in the construction process so that the building is neat, attractive, respectful of the Billings business, and follows plan accurately.
GOOD

Construction was careful, respectful, and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
FAIR

Construction was careful, respectful, and accurate for the most part, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
UNACCEPTABLE

Construction appears careless, haphazard, or disrespectful. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Insufficient quality evidenced in incomplete or ineffective structure.
PRESENTATION

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes detailed reflection on how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside, as well as definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD

Prepared, but could benefit from more rehearsal or voice projection. Includes detailed reflection on how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside, as well as definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR

Poorly prepared, minimal description on how your design reflects the name of a Billings business, or items sold inside, and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Student would not present.



Keywords:
  • architecture

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202