Skip to main content

iRubric: Peter Pan Research Power Point Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Peter Pan Research Power Point Presentation 
Contextualizing Night Research Paper
Research the approved topic in a group format Submit a presentation about topic following MLA guidelines. Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the presentation. Presentation will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, presentation style and quality, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: WAC59X
By algford
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Exceeds Expectations

10 pts

Meets Expectations

9 pts

Working Towards Meeting Expectation

8 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

6.8 pts

Quality of Presentation
30 %

Focus Correction Area 1
Exceeds Expectations

--Presentation is visually appealing to audience and shows great creativity.
Meets Expectations

Presentation is mostly visually appealing to audience and shows some creativity.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

Presentation is neat, but shows little evidence of creativity.
Does Not Meet Expectations

Presentation is messy or disorganized and shows no evidence of creativity or thought as to how it appears to the audience.
Content
40 %

Focus Correction Area 2
Exceeds Expectations

--Topic is clear
--Slides are well-explained, leaving no doubt as to who, what, when, where, why
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Meets Expectations

--Topic is somewhat clear
--Slides are mostly well-explained, leaving little doubt as to who, what, when, where, why
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

--Topic lacks clarity
--Slides are not very well-explained, leaving doubt as to who, what, when, where, why
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Does Not Meet Expectations

--Content of presentation is completely unclear and leaves audience with too many questions
--Little to no evidence of organization, transitions, introduction, or conclusion
Works Cited/Bibliography
20 %

Focus Correction Area 3
Exceeds Expectations

--All sources credible
--All sources properly cited in both presentation and bibliography.
-- No more errors in format or punctuation.
Meets Expectations

--All sources credible
--All sources properly cited in both presentation and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

--All sources credible
--Not all sources properly cited in both presentation and bibliography.
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Does Not Meet Expectations

--Not all sources credible
--Not all sources properly cited in both presentation and bibliography.
-- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %

Focus Correction Area 4
Exceeds Expectations

-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
Meets Expectations

-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Does Not Meet Expectations

-- Correct word choice.
--More than 4 spelling errors.
--More than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202