- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Science Learning Center Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Science Learning Center Rubric Science Learning Center Rubric Used to assess how well students participate, engage one another, meet the objectives and accomplish the tasks set at a self-directed learning center Rubric Code: WAA5W8 By fabiolaramirez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Learning Center Rubric
	Excellent 5 pts	Well done 3 pts	Minimal 1 pts	Improvement Needed 0 pts
Group Engagement	Excellent -Works collaboratively with group members. -Uses compromise to avoid arguments.	Well done -Works together with group to complete the tasks with minimal arguing and evidence of compromise.	Minimal -Works together with group, but tend to argue instead of discussing their differences with little evidence of compromise.	Improvement Needed -Group does not work together and argues without compromising.
Participation	Excellent -Student works hard to complete all tasks in the time given.	Well done -Student completes almost all tasks during class time.	Minimal -Student does minimal work, or rushes to complete quickly without regard to quality. -Student displays off-task behavior.	Improvement Needed -Student refuses to work. -Student allows partner to work without giving input. -Student displays off-task behavior multiple times.
Task Completion	Excellent -All Learning Center Tasks (Group and Individual) are complete. -Work is high quality, and completed as instructed	Well done -Most Learning Center tasks are completed correctly, as instructed by the teacher.	Minimal -Learning Center work is acceptable quality, but varies greatly from instructions given by the teacher.	Improvement Needed -Individual work is incomplete.
Science Journal	Excellent -Directions were followed. - The prompt is fully answered and shows evidence of learning. -Work is neatly done with minimal to no punctuation/grammar errors.	Well done -Directions were followed. - The prompt is mostly answered and shows evidence of learning. -Work is neatly done with minimal punctuation/grammar errors.	Minimal -Directions were not closely followed. -The prompt was not fully answered and there was little evidence of learning. -Work is not neatly done and includes many punctuation/ grammar errors.	Improvement Needed -Directions were not followed. -Work does not answer the prompt. -Work is not neatly done and includes many punctuation/ grammar errors.