Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Pre-AP Interpersonal Speaking 2015 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Pre-AP Interpersonal Speaking 2015
Oral- Interpersonal Speaking
Rubric Code:
WA756X
By
juanitafa
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Interpersonal Speaking
(Strong)
5 pts
(Good)
4 pts
(Fair)
3 pts
(Weak)
2 pts
(Poor)
1 pts
Exchange
(Strong)
Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is clearly appropriate within the context of the task
(Good)
Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is generally appropriate within the context of the task
(Fair)
Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is somewhat appropriate within the context of the task
(Weak)
Partially maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is minimally appropriate within the context of the
task
(Poor)
Unsuccessfully attempts to maintain the exchange by providing a series of responses that is inappropriate within
the context of the task
Information
(Strong)
Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement and support of opinion) with frequent
elaboration
(Good)
Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement and support of opinion) with some
elaboration
(Fair)
Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement and support of opinion)
(Weak)
Provides some required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement and support of opinion)
(Poor)
Provides little required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement and support of opinion)
Comprehensibility
(Strong)
Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
(Good)
Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility
(Fair)
Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility
(Weak)
Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener
(Poor)
Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility
Vocabulary
(Strong)
Varied and appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language
(Good)
Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language
(Fair)
Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language
(Weak)
Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language
(Poor)
Very few vocabulary resources
Structure
(Strong)
Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax and usage, with few errors
(Good)
General control of grammar, syntax and usage
(Fair)
Some control of grammar, syntax and usage
(Weak)
Limited control of grammar, syntax and usage
(Poor)
Little or no control of grammar, syntax and usage
Register
(Strong)
Mostly consistent use of register appropriate for the conversation
(Good)
Generally consistent use of register appropriate for the conversation, except for occasional shifts
(Fair)
Use of register may be inappropriate for the conversation with several shifts
(Weak)
Use of register is generally inappropriate for the conversation
(Poor)
Minimal or no attention to register
Fluency
(Strong)
Pronunciation, intonation and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
(Good)
Pronunciation, intonation and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
(Fair)
Pronunciation, intonation and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede
comprehensibility
(Weak)
Pronunciation, intonation and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede
comprehensibility
(Poor)
Pronunciation, intonation and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility
Self-Monitoring
(Strong)
Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility
(Good)
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility
(Fair)
Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility
(Weak)
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility
(Poor)
Clarification or self-correction (if present) does not improve comprehensibility
Keywords:
Interpersonal Speaking
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.