iRubric: Holocaust Group Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Holocaust Group Project Students will give a visual and verbal presentation on the Holocaust to present as a Holocaust Memorial. Rubric Code: W9A769 By tamijett Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Holocaust Small Group Project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Visuals	Poor Lacks clear visual presentation; does not include more than one picture from the time period; visuals are not appropriate representation of topic and content; visuals are not labelled correctly	Fair Contains more than one visual representation of topic but lacks variety; presentation is somewhat clear; represents the topic; labels are present on each visual.	Good Clear presentation; variety of visuals used; presentation is clear and easily understood; represents the topic well and is interesting; all visuals are labelled for ease of understanding.
Written Work	Poor Writing is copied directly from research rather than summarized; information is scattered and not well organized; missing important details such as dates, names of important events and/or figures to reflect accurately the visual presentation; information is somewhat off topic and gives opinion rather than facts.	Fair Writing is summarized with some direct copying; information is organized; some important details are present, but not all details reflect visual presentation; information is focused on topic, but facts are somewhat unclear.	Good Clear summary of informational text researched with no direct copying; information is well organized and easy to follow; important details are clear and present and reflect the visual presentation; information is clearly presented and focused and includes relevant facts.
Research Process	Poor Little research was completed and no variety in sources; group did not produced evidence of sufficient research on topic; no notes were taken or presented; unclear of sources.	Fair Research was completed, but lacks variety of sources; group produced some evidence of research on topic, but fell short of minimum requirements; little notes were taken or presented; lacking evidence of all sources used.	Good Researched well the topic and used a variety of sources; group presented clear evidence of research sources; met and/or exceeded research requirements; took sufficient notes and presented them as evidence of research; presented all sources used for completion of project.
Conventions	Poor 3 or more convention errors such as spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization.	Fair 2 or fewer convention errors such as spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization	Good 1 or fewer convention errors such as spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization.