- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Teacher Introduction Glogster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Teacher Introduction Glogster Glogster Rubric For Educ 346 Educational Technology Lab 1 Rubric Code: W93962 By edtechprof Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Glogster
	Target 2 pts	Acceptable 1 pts	Needs Improvement 0 pts
Ownership	Target The glog contains author's name and photo on a location that serves as a great focal point (upper third or middle third of the blog.) The name is easy to read and the photo is of high quality.	Acceptable The glog contains author's name and photo. The location may not be ideal (i.e. not easy to see.) The size may be too big or too small for the glog. Photo is fuzzy or of low quality.	Needs Improvement Author's name and/or photo is missing.
Graphics	Target There are at least five graphic elements illustrating the author's passions. Graphics selected are of high quality and enhances the readers interest or understanding.	Acceptable Graphics are related to the author's passions, and are of acceptable quality.	Needs Improvement Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader. Connection with the author's passion is not clear.
Content	Target The author shared five passions that are appropriate for teacher candidates. Graphics are accompanied by a 2-3 sentence explanatory text that elaborates on these passions.	Acceptable The graphics are accompanied by at least one sentence explanatory text.	Needs Improvement The glog lacks sufficient information for the viewer to know more about the author. There may be information that is inappropriate for educational purposes.
Grammar and Spelling	Target There are no grammatical errors or misspellings.	Acceptable There are 1 - 2 grammatical errors / misspelling	Needs Improvement There are more than two grammatical error or misspelling.
Visual Appeal	Target The overall look of the glog is cohesive and appealing (color, font). The content is easy to read. There are clear focal points that guide the viewers eyes while looking at this glog.	Acceptable The glog is neat and organized. Colors of background, fonts, and some graphics detract from the content.	Needs Improvement The elements are laid out in a haphazard manner. Colors of background and fonts make the content hard to read.