- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Analysis Spring 2012 Midterm rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Analysis Spring 2012 Midterm Analysis Spring 2012 Rubric Code: W7W392 By tizlar Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

DIRECTING PROMPT BOOK
	Unsastisfactory (N/A)	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)	POINT EARNED (N/A)
Directing Analysis
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
First Script Impression	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student lists information concerning their likes/dislikes of the playscript, yet it is not well supported and/ or is less than 3 paragraphs	Fair Student lists what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in less than 3 paragraphs and/or information is supported generally using the script as reference.	Good Student effectively list what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in 3-5 paragraphs or more. Evidence is supported specifically using the script as reference.	Excellent Student effectively listed what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in 3-5 paragraphs or more. Student has effectively supported their conclusion with specific commentary using the script as a vehicle for discussion.	POINTS EARNED
Given Circumstances Environmental facts Polar Attitudes Previous Action
Geographical Location	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student list geographical location without support and/or states geographical location is not specific	Fair Student generally includes place and/or randomly selects a location not supported by the script. Significant information is not included or supported	Good Student effectively included the exact place including climate and supports conclusion	Excellent Student effectively included the exact place including climate. Significant information delineating environmental factors pulled from tangible research is also included	POINTS EARNED
Date	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student states season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day the scenes in the play take place and/or state the significance of the date	Fair Student generally includes season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day the scenes in the play takes place. Significance of the date is general.	Good Student effectively includes season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day scenes in the play takes place. Significance of date is clearly stated and supported.	Excellent Student effectively includes and supports season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day scenes in the play takes place. Student also discusses significance of the date and includes tangible research sources.	POINTS EARNED
Economic	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student briefly states the economic environment(s) found in the play. Statement of class level is incomplete and/or discussion is severely limited.	Fair Student generally communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectively listing the class level while generally stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student research support is incomplete and/or is not adequately supported.	Good Student effectively communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectivley listing the class level while stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student researches and includes discussion on one/two/or three class levels when more are present.	Excellent Student effectively communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectivley listing the class level while stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student researches and includes two or more economic levels if used in the play.	POINTS EARNED
Political	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally includes the relatationship of the characters to the form of government under which they live.	Fair Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live.	Good Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live. Student effectively uses the script to support their conclusion. External research sources (research) is utilized and cited.	Excellent Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live. The script is used well to support the student's conclusion. In addition, research is documented and supported with tangible research sources.	POINTS EARNED
Social	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally list the mores and social institutions under which the characters live.	Fair Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live.	Good Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live. The conclusion drawn is listed and supported effectively with examples from the script	Excellent Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live. The conclusion drawn is listed and supported effectively with examples from the script. External research sources are used and is effectively documented.	POINTS EARNED
Religious	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally lists formal and informal psychological controls.	Fair Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described.	Good Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described. Specific information from the script is documented to support conclusion.	Excellent Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described. Specific information from the script is documented to support the conclusion(s) drawn. External sources are used effectively.	POINTS EARNED
Previous Action	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally compiles a list indicating previous action. Work is not supported.	Fair Student generally includes a specific list indicating previous action located within the script. Information is documented.	Good Student effectively includes a specific list indicating and supported previous action located within the script. Information is documented.	Excellent Student effectively includes a specific list indicating and supporting previous action located within the script. Information is documented effectively using the script.	POINTS EARNED
Polar Attitudes	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally lists polar attitudes of one or more characters in the play and/or provides a concise explanation without listing the polar attitude.	Fair Student includes and effectively supports polar attitudes of at least one character within the play. A concise explanation of the selected attitudes are included.	Good Student includes and effectively supports polar attitudes of main characters within the play; student also includes a concise explanation of selected attitudes using the script to support their findings	Excellent Student effectively includes and supports polar attitudes of each character within the play; student also includes a concise explanation of selected attitudes using the script to support their findings	POINTS EARNED
Summary of Environmental facts
Significance of the facts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a brief summary statement of environmental facts.	Fair Student includes a summary statement of environmental facts, yet fails to effectively support/connect the facts to the play.	Good Student includes a strong summary statement determining how the environmental facts affect the total meaning to the play.	Excellent Student includes and supports a strong summary statement determining how the environmental facts affect the total meaning of the play. Student effectively cite sources.	POINTS EARNED
Character
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Super Objective	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student lists strong objective of the character(s), yet fails to list the super objective	Fair Student effectively list the super objective of the characters	Good Student effectively lists the super objective of some characters in the play/ scene selection	Excellent Student lists and supports super objective of all characters in the play by using internal/external sources to support conclusion drawn	POINTS EARNED
Desire	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides a general statement of what the character(s) wants most	Fair Student provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most	Good Student supports and provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most	Excellent Student supports and provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most. Statement is not superficial.	POINTS EARNED
Will	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires	Fair Student provides a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires	Good Student provides and support a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires	Excellent Student provides and support a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires. Specifically answers questions: 1. How strong or weak is his/her inner strength? 2. Is it strong enough to push him/her to the full limit or will he compromise?	POINTS EARNED
Moral Stance	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general description of the characters' values	Fair Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires	Good Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires. Student includes a description of how honest the character is with others and his/herself. Additionally, does the character(s) have a sense of moral responsibility to others?	Excellent Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires. Student includes a description of how honest the character is with others and his/herself. Additionally, does the character(s) have a sense of moral responsibility to others? Finally, what is the moral code that governs his/her inner behavior? What is his/her sense of integrity?	POINTS EARNED
Decorum	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise.	Fair Student includes a specific description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise.	Good Student includes a specific and clearly supported description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise. Also, student includes a list of the characters' physical characteristics seemingly required by the given circumstances.	Excellent Student includes a specific and clearly supported description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise. Also, student includes a list of the characters' physical characteristics seemingly required by the given circumstances. Lastly, student includes a written description of how the character(s) walk, how the character(s) stand, how the character(s) speak, etc.	POINTS EARNED
Summary adjectives	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair N/A	Good N/A	Excellent Student summarizes all of the categories above using adjectives only. Do not set down a character's dramatic actions but only the traits the character reveal.	POINTS EARNED
Initial character-mood-intensity 1. Heartbeat: rate 2. Perspiration: heavy, light, etc. 3. Stomach condition 4. Muscle tension 5. Breathing: rate, depth	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides a general sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity (each character in scene must be included)	Fair Student provides a general sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity at the beginning of each scene (each character in scene must be included)	Good Student provides a detailed sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity at the beginning of each scene (each character in scene must be included)	Excellent Student provides detailed descriptions clearly supporting the characters' nervosity at the beginning of each scene and/or unit	POINTS EARNED
Dialogue
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Choice of words	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally includes choice of words for the playwright and/or character. Information is not supported and/or efficiently evaluated.	Fair Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and/or character(s) uses in select acts, and/or scenes, yet does not support and/or evaluate the choice of words for the play in its entirety.	Good Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and characters within the script use in which to tell the story. Evaluation is supported and cited using internal/ external sources.	Excellent Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and characters within the script use in which to tell the story. Environmental facts, such as the economic, social, and religious factors are built upon effectively in written discussion.	POINTS EARNED
Phrases and sentence structure	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student generally evaluates the structure of lines and speeches found within the script. Information stated is not well supported.	Fair Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student will evaluate and support the structure of lines and speeches found within the script.	Good Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student evaluated the structure of lines and speeches found within the script using the script as a catalyst of discussion.	Excellent Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures. Additionally, student will evaluate the structure of lines and speeches found within the script using the script as a catalyst of discussion. Student will provide a strong written summary while listing how this information acquired has helped their interprettion and/or will aid in communicating more effectively with their actors. External sources are used and cited.	POINTS EARNED
Choice of images	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements.	Poor Choice of image(s) is general and is not supported by internal and/or external sources.	Fair Choice of image is specific yet is not well supported by internal and/or external sources.	Good Choice of image is specific and is well supported by internal sources.	Excellent Choice of image is specific and is well supported by internal and external sources. Sources utilize are cited.	POINTS EARNED
Peculiar characteristic	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is generally stated.	Fair Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is specifically stated.	Good Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is stated and supported using tangible evidence from the script.	Excellent Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is stated and supported using tangible evidence from the script and external sources.	POINTS EARNED
Idea
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 20 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Theme Statement	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general If/then statement.	Fair Student includes a general If/then statement and supports statement using internal sources.	Good Student includes a specific If/then statement and supports statement using internal and/or external sources.	Excellent Student includes a specific major and minor If/then statement and supports statements using internal and/or external sources.	POINTS EARNED
Meaning of Title	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and/or states "a meaning does not exist"	Fair Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and supports it generally using evidence from the script	Good Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it generally using evidence from the script	Excellent Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it specific using evidence from the script and/or external sources	POINTS EARNED
Technical elements
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Groundplan	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage.	Fair Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 3 acting areas.	Good Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 5 acting areas. The Groundplan supports the dramatic action.	Excellent Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 5 acting areas. The groundplan supports the dramatic action of the piece and is well balanced. A concise summary of groundplan and dramatic action is included and internal/external support is clearly given.	POINTS EARNED
Aristotle's elements of Drama	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair N/A	Good Student list Aristotle's six elements of drama in order of importance based on scene/play selected. 1. Plot 2. Character 3. Thought/ theme 4. Language 5. Music 6. Spectacle	Excellent Student list Aristotle's six elements of drama in order of importance based on scene/play selected. Student includes a concise summary explaining reasoning for rating. 1. Plot 2. Character 3. Thought/ theme 4. Language 5. Music 6. Spectacle	POINTS EARNED
Tools in Staging
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Units/ Objectives	Unsatisfactory Units and objectives are generally indicated	Poor Units are well marked; actor's objectives consistently include a verb	Fair Units are well marked; actor's objectives consistently include a verb. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	Good Units are well marked; actor's objectives consistently include a transitive verb and receiver. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	Excellent Units are well marked; actor's objectives consistently include a transitive verb, receiver, and desired response. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	POINTS EARNED
Miscellaneous
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Bibliography	Unsatisfactory Sources are not cited	Poor Sources are listed and/or improperly cited	Fair Some sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format	Good All sources are listed yet are improperly cited using MLA format (books, articles, webpages, photos, etc.)	Excellent All sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format (books, articles, webpages, photos, etc.)	POINTS EARNED
Livebinder	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student updated the LiveBinder to include sites explored. LiveBinder has at least 1 website explored.	Fair Student updated the LiveBinder to include sites explored. LiveBinder has at least 3 websites explored.	Good Student updated the LiveBinder to include the websites explored. LiveBinder has at least 5 websites explored.	Excellent Student consistently updated the LiveBinder to include the websites explored. LiveBinder has at least 7 websites explored.	POINTS EARNED

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric