Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Ancient/Classical Art History Term Paper-Wiki rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Ancient/Classical Art History Term Paper-Wiki
Ancient/Classical Art History Term Paper-Wiki
This 10 page paper and Wiki with visuals will research, explore and report on a topic in Ancient and Classical Art and culture - in depth
Rubric Code:
W72AA4
By
JoannaMatuszak
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Art History Term Paper
Does Not Meet <2.8
1 pts
Meets at a Low Level 3.2
(N/A)
Meets at Mid-level 3.5
(N/A)
Superior to Exceeds 3.8-4
(N/A)
Research/Documentation
Does Not Meet <2.8
Uses less than 2 book sources and 4 qualified Internet sources. Research is minimal. Bibliography is missing, incomplete or incorrect. Few or no citations.
Meets at a Low Level 3.2
2 minimal book sources 4 internet sources - not all of which are fully qualified. Bibliography has 1 or fewer minor error. Few citations.
Meets at Mid-level 3.5
2 book sources and 4 qualified internet sources. Bibliography is complete and accurate. Adequate citations.
Superior to Exceeds 3.8-4
Uses 2 or more book sources and 4 or more qualified Internet sources. Bibliography is complete - research is accurately cited throughout the paper and is also presented on the Wiki.
Proceedure
Does Not Meet <2.8
Thesis statement is unclear. Few or no notes are taken during research. Uses no outline or a partial or unclear outline. Does not hand in a rough draft by the due date
Meets at a Low Level 3.2
Clear thesis statement. Some original notes are taken. Out line is used - but not clear. Rough draft is handed in but is late or incomplete. Final draft is edited, but not completely fixed
Meets at Mid-level 3.5
Clear thesis statement. Adequate original notes are taken. Outline is simple and clear. Rough draft is adequate and handed in on time. Final draft reflects editing suggestions and is handed in/posted wiki by the due date.
Superior to Exceeds 3.8-4
Writes a clear and concise thesis statement. Copiouis original notes are taken from research. Constructs an organized and complete outline. Hands in a rough-draft of thepaper on time. Edits the rough draft making all necessary changes. Hands in the final paper/posts the final wiki by the due date.
Content and Presentation
Does Not Meet <2.8
Writes a poorly researched paper that expresses only minimal understanding of the topic - may be missing information on context, content or formal analysis or the art. Wiki is incomplete or not done at all.
Meets at a Low Level 3.2
Writes a moderately researched paper on the topic that expresses some understanding of the art, context(s) and culture(s) (though all aspects are present)of the topic. Wiki is a carbon-copy of the paper.
Meets at Mid-level 3.5
Writes a well-researched paper on the chosen topic that expresses moderately deep understanding of the art, context(s), and culture(s) of the topic. Wiki is complete but complimented by only a few graphics.
Superior to Exceeds 3.8-4
Writes a well-researched paper on the chosen topic that expresses a significantly deep understanding of the art, context(s) and culture(s) of the topic. Wiki includes a variety of relevant artwork, maps, or other visuals - as well as the bibliography.
Organization and Writing skills
Does Not Meet <2.8
Resarch paper is poorly organized and hard to follow. Paper has many grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors.
Meets at a Low Level 3.2
Research paper is somewhat organized but still coherent. Thesis is fairly well illustrated/defended. Final aper has a number of grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors -
Meets at Mid-level 3.5
Final research paper is well organized and well written with minimal grammatical, spelling or structural errors. Thesis is well illustrated/defended.
Superior to Exceeds 3.8-4
Research paper is very well organized - with the topic explored methodically in terms of context, meaning and formal analysis of the art -for clear illustration/defense of the thesis. Final paper is written with few or no grammatical, spelling or structural errors.
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.