iRubric: Ancient/Classical Art History Term Paper-Wiki rubric

Thesis statement is unclear. Few or no notes are taken during research. Uses no outline or a partial or unclear outline. Does not hand in a rough draft by the due date

Clear thesis statement. Some original notes are taken. Out line is used - but not clear. Rough draft is handed in but is late or incomplete. Final draft is edited, but not completely fixed

Clear thesis statement. Adequate original notes are taken. Outline is simple and clear. Rough draft is adequate and handed in on time. Final draft reflects editing suggestions and is handed in/posted wiki by the due date.

Writes a clear and concise thesis statement. Copiouis original notes are taken from research. Constructs an organized and complete outline. Hands in a rough-draft of thepaper on time. Edits the rough draft making all necessary changes. Hands in the final paper/posts the final wiki by the due date.

Resarch paper is poorly organized and hard to follow. Paper has many grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors.

Research paper is somewhat organized but still coherent. Thesis is fairly well illustrated/defended. Final aper has a number of grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors -

Final research paper is well organized and well written with minimal grammatical, spelling or structural errors. Thesis is well illustrated/defended.

Research paper is very well organized - with the topic explored methodically in terms of context, meaning and formal analysis of the art -for clear illustration/defense of the thesis. Final paper is written with few or no grammatical, spelling or structural errors.