Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: FFA Parliamentary Procedure rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
FFA Parliamentary Procedure
FFA Parliamentary Procedure
Teams of 6 people will devise (create) and perform a Parliamentary Procedures Demonstration
Rubric Code:
W6924W
By
crandall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Vocational
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
Poor
(N/A)
Struggling
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Striving
(N/A)
Outstanding
(N/A)
Knowledge of Parli. Procedure
Main Motion
Amendment
Poor
Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 1 or zero abilities.
(1-10 PTS.)
Struggling
Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 2 abilities. (11-20 PTS.)
Good
Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 3 abilities.
(21-30 PTS.)
Striving
Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 4 abilities. (31-40 PTS.)
Outstanding
Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 5 (all) abilities.
(41-50 PTS.)
Poise and Manner Displayed
Enter criteria description
Poor
Few or none of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling
Some of the items of business were discussed with with a moderate level of poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good
Some of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving
The majority of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(7-8 PTS.)
Outstanding
All items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(9-10 PTS.)
Grammar and Sentence Structure
Enter criteria description
Poor
Discussion did not include clear and concise statements. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was weak.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling
Little of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was below average.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good
Some discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was average.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving
The majority of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was moderately strong.
(7-8 PTS.)
Outstanding
All discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was strong.
(9-10 PTS.)
Voice and Expression
Poor
None of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling
Few of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good
Some of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Some of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving
Most of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Most of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(7-8 PTS.)
Outstanding
All team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(9-10 PTS.)
Questions
Poor
Answered 1 or zero questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Struggling
Answered 2 questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Good
Answered 3 questions correctly with some hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Striving
Answered 4 questions correctly, with very little hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Outstanding
Answered 5 (all) questions correctly, with no hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Subjects:
Vocational
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Vocational rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.