Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Poetry Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Poetry Analysis
TP-CASTT Poetry Analysis
Rubric Code:
W5W574
By
arbobro13
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Poetry Analysis Rubric
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Title
Poor
Does not examine meaning between the title and poem. Does not include predictions before reading and new meaning after reading.
Fair
Examines meaning between the title and poem but does not extend beyond a basic explanation. (2-3 sentences)
Good
Fully examines meaning between the title and the poem. Extends beyond a basic explanation. (3-4 sentences)
Excellent
Goes beyond expectations and examines the meaning of the title in a literal and non-literal sense. Extends beyond the most basic of explanations. (5-6 sentences)
Paraphrase
Poor
Does not paraphrase any part of the poem.
Fair
Paraphrases a part of the poem but does not offer an analysis.
Good
Includes paraphrases of parts of the poem and an indepth analysis of the paraphrases.
Excellent
Paraphrases the entire poem and also parts of the poem that are important to the overall meaning. Goes beyond the literal meaning.
Connotation
Poor
Does not discuss the poetic devices of the poem.
Fair
Discusses few poetic devices but does not offer an indepth analysis of why they are important.
Good
Fully discusses multiple poetic devices and offers an analysis of their importance.
Excellent
Goes beyond the expectations and offers and in dept analysis of multiple poetic devices and their importance to the poem.
Attitude
Poor
Does not discuss attitude of the poem (tone or mood).
Fair
Discusses attitude, both tone and mood, but does not offer an indepth analysis of either.
Good
Includes an in depth analysis, both tone and mood, of the use of attitude in the poem. Fully explains both tone and mood.
Excellent
Goes beyond expectations and includes an in depth analysis of both tone and mood and its use in the poem. Gives a full explanation of both.
Shifts
Poor
Does not discuss the shifts in the poem.
Fair
Discusses the shifts but does not offer any analysis.
Good
Includes an analysis of the use of shifts in the poem but may not be fully analyzed.
Excellent
Goes beyond expectations and provides an in depth analysis of multiple shifts throughout the poem.
Theme
Poor
Does not discuss the the theme of the poem.
Fair
Mentions the theme of the poem but does not offer any analysis. Theme may be literal or too specific.
Good
Includes an indepth analysis the theme of the poem that goes beyond the literal meaning. Theme is concise and is related to humans/the human condition.
Excellent
Goes beyond expectations and includes and in depth analysis of the theme of the poem (or multiple themes). Theme goes well beyond the literal meaning and provides insight into the human condition.
Introduction
Poor
Lacks one or more of the following elements: specific attention getter, logical progression of ideas, clear thesis statement.
Fair
Uses a specific attention getter. Links the attention getter to the thesis through a logical progression of ideas. Ends with a thesis statement.
Good
Uses specific and interesting attention getter. Links attention getter to the thesis through a logical progression of ideas. Ends with a clear thesis statement. Mentions the author and title of the piece.
Excellent
Uses an interesting attention getter, the intro flows, the intro explains main topics of the analysis and ends with a clear, well-thought out thesis statement. Mentions the author and title of the piece.
Conclusion
Poor
Conclusion either restates the thesis in the exact same words as the intro or does not restate it at all. Needs to be more developed. Leaves the reader feeling there should be more to the paper. Ends with one or more of the following: a question, a cliche, or brings up a new topic not discussed in the paper.
Fair
Conclusion restates the thesis differently than in the introduction. Conclusion is adequately developed. Does not end with a cliche or a question, and does not bring up a new topic not discussed in the paper.
Good
Restates the thesis differently than in the introduction. Conclusino is fully developed and brings a sense of closure to the piece. Does not end with a cliche or a question, and does not bring up a new topic not discussed in the paper.
Excellent
Goes beyond expectations and provides the reader with a clear sense of the poetry analysis. Loose ends are tied up and the reader is clear on the meaning/thesis of the analysis.
Evidence
Poor
Lack of citations in analysis. No explanation of quotes is present. (0-1 citation)
Fair
Some citations are present. Citations are not fully explained. (1-2 citations)
Good
Citations are explained fully and are present throughout the analysis. (3-4 citations)
Excellent
Many citations are used to support the thesis and meaning of poem. Goes beyond expectations by providing the reader with clear evidence. (4+ citations)
TP-CASTT Organizer
Poor
Does not include a TP-CASTT Organizer.
Fair
Includes a TP-CASTT Organizer but it is not complete.
Good
Includes a completed TP-CASTT Organizer.
Excellent
Includes a TP-CASTT Organizer that is thorough and well thought out.
Grammar
Poor
Paper has 7+ grammar or spelling mistakes.
Fair
Paper has 5-7 grammar or spelling mistakes.
Good
Paper has 0-5 grammar or spelling mistakes.
Excellent
Paper is grammar and spelling error free.
Effort
Poor
Little effort is evident. Paper is not typed and/or messy. Paper is very short (less than 1 page double spaced)
Fair
Some effort is evident. Paper is typed but may be messy. Paper is short (less than 2 pages double spaced)
Good
Obvious effort is evident. Paper is typed, neat and of appropriate length (2+ pages double spaced)
Excellent
Effort is beyond expectations and it is clear a lot of time and thought was put into the analysis. Paper is neat, typed, includes a cover page and is of appropriate length (2+ pages double spaced)
Punctual
5+ Days Late
1 pts
3-4 Days Late
2 pts
1-2 Days Late
(N/A)
On Time
4 pts
Time
5+ Days Late
Paper is 5 or more days late.
3-4 Days Late
Paper is 3-4 days late.
1-2 Days Late
Paper is 1-2 days late.
On Time
Paper is turned in on time.
Keywords:
TP-CASTT Poetry Analysis
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.