Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Multimedia Project- San Angelo State Park rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Multimedia Project- San Angelo State Park
Multimedia Project- Environmetal Science
Create a multimedia presentation which includes text, audio, video, and graphics supporting the San Angelo State Park
Rubric Code:
W56AX7
By
embeene
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Environmental Science Multimedia
unacceptable
1 pts
needs work
2 pts
acceptable
3 pts
exemplary
4 pts
Content/Organization
40 %
unacceptable
Includes little essential information and one or two facts. No logical sequence of information.
needs work
Includes some essential information with few citations and few facts. Some logical sequence of information.
acceptable
Includes essential information with most sources properly cited; includes enough elaboration to give readers an understanding of the topic. Logical sequence of information.
exemplary
Covers topic completely and in depth; includes properly cited sources and complete information; encourages reader to know more. Logical, intuitive sequence of information.
Originality
20 %
unacceptable
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought.
needs work
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.
acceptable
The product show evidence of originality and inventiveness. Although based on the collection of other people's ideas, products, images, and inventions, the work extends and offers new insight.
exemplary
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of content and many ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based on logical conclusions and sound research.
Design
15 %
unacceptable
Includes few graphics from outside sources, few animations and advanced features. Graphics selected are superfluous. No original powerpoint jpegs created. No music
needs work
Includes fewer than 3 graphics from outside sources, fewer than 3 animations and few advanced features such as video, links or sound. Graphics rarely support text and presentation. No original jpegs created. Music inserted but not appropriate
acceptable
Includes 3-4 graphics from outside sources, least 3-4 animations and some advanced features such as video. Graphics relate to text and presentation. One or two original jpegs created.Music inserted and appropriate but sound quality not good.
exemplary
Includes 5 or more graphics from outside sources, 5 or more animations and several advanced features, such as video. Graphics explain and reinforce text and presentation. very good original jpegs created. Excellent choice of music
Mechanics
10 %
unacceptable
Presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors.
needs work
Presentation has three or more misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
acceptable
Presentation has fewer than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
exemplary
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Voice over
5 %
unacceptable
Great difficulty communicating ideas. Poor voice projection. Little preparation or incomplete work.
needs work
Some difficulty communicating ideas, due to voice projection, lack of preparation, or incomplete work.
acceptable
Communicates ideas with proper voice projection. Adequate preparation and delivery.
exemplary
Communicates ideas with enthusiasm, proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear delivery.
References
10 %
unacceptable
No internal citations, No reference sheet handed in with URL's of pictures. Unacceptable zero on report if not corrected
needs work
less than three quality references. References not done correctly. URL's of photos correct. Internal citations not done correctly
acceptable
three quality references but problems with correct citations. URL's of photos correct.
exemplary
5 quality references with correct citations. Url's of photos correct.
Keywords:
Multimedia Presentation, Natural resources, environmental science
Subjects:
English
Science
Vocational
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.