Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Technology Paper Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Technology Paper Rubric
Persuasive Paper Rubric
For a 3-page research paper in Ms. McGeehan's grade 11 English class. Its purpose is to discuss the impact of a new or relatively new technology on society, based on their 24-hour experience of giving up an aspect of daily technology. The paper as a prewriting assignment prior to reading the science fiction novel "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury.
Rubric Code:
W547A7
By
alixmcgeehan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Technology Paper Rubric
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Below Average
(N/A)
Unacceptable
(N/A)
Comments
(N/A)
Journal
20 pts
Excellent
Student’s responses are very detailed and show great depth.
Student fully understands and communicates ideas in writing. Writing is insightful, shows deep understanding of the relationship between techonology and daily life, and goes beyond the obvious. (20 pts.)
Good
Student’s responses
have details and
depth. Student attempts to fully understand and communicate ideas in writing. Writing is insightful and shows understanding of the relationship between techonology and daily life. (12 pts.)
Fair
Student’s responses are limited in detail and depth. Student generally attempts to understand and communicate ideas in writing. Writing is occasionally insightful and shows some understanding of the relationship between techonology and daily life. (9 pts.)
Below Average
Student’s responses lack detail and depth.
Student seldom attempts to understand and communicate ideas in writing. Writing lacks insight and understanding of the relationship between techonology and daily life. (7 pt.)
Unacceptable
No journal was submitted. (0 pts.)
Comments
Score=_________
Focus - Thesis Statement
10 pts
Excellent
Assertion/thesis statement was clearly stated at the end of the introductory paragraph and consistently maintained throughout paper. Clear references to the effect of technology dependence were stated. (10 pts)
Good
Assertion/thesis statement was clearly stated and consistently maintained throughout the paper. Important references to the effect of technology dependence were stated, but more and clearer ones could be mentioned. (8 pts)
Fair
Basic assertion/thesis statement for topic attempted but was not consistently maintained throughout the paper. A few important references to the effect of technology dependence were mentioned. (6 pts)
Below Average
Assertion/thesis statement attempted but was very weak and incomplete. One or no references to the effect of technology dependence were mentioned. (4 pts)
Unacceptable
Assertion/thesis statement could not be determined. (0 pts)
Comments
Score=_________
Analysis - Supporting Evidence
30 pts
Excellent
Evidence clearly supported the assertion/thesis. Evidence and quotes were sufficient, and personal experience is used expertly as support for the impact of technology on everyday life. (30 pts)
Good
Evidence and quotes clearly supported the assertion/thesis, but there were not enough. Personal experience is used for support but not entirely reflective of the impact of technology on everyday life. (25 pts)
Fair
Assertion/thesis was supported by limited evidence/quotes. Some are improperly cited. Personal experience is mentioned but does not support the impact of technology on everyday life. (20 pts)
Below Average
One or two improperly cited quotes that support assertion/thesis statement. Personal expereince is barely mentioned. (15 pts)
Unacceptable
No properly cited quotes that support assertion/thesis statement. Personal experienc is not mentioned. (0 pts)
Comments
Score=_________
Organization
10 pts
Excellent
Had an introduction that hooked the reader into the paper. Also had a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs had at least 5-7 sentences and were well developed. Effective transitions were used. (10 pts)
Good
Introduction was interesting. Had a beginning, middle and end. Most paragraphs had 5-7 sentences, were developed and transitions were used. (8 pts)
Fair
The writer tried to create an introduction to grab the reader's attention. Some paragraphs had between 5-7 sentences and are only somewhat developed. Some transitions were used. The argument has been made, but the structure is poorly developed. (6 pts)
Below Average
Introduction was trite, showing little originality. Paper jumped from topic to topic with little or no apparent organization. (4 pts)
Unacceptable
There was a total lack of structure. (0 pts)
Comments
Score=_________
Style & Conventions
10 pts
Excellent
Paper was a full three pages long. It was done in the proper MLA format works cited page.
No mistakes in spelling, punctuation or grammar. (10 pts)
Good
Paper was nearly three pages long. Used the proper MLA format, and had aworks cited page. Few mistakes in spelling, punctuation and grammar. (8 pts)
Fair
Paper was only 2 pages long. Used some of the MLA format but incorrectly. Significant mistakes in spelling punctuation and grammar. (6 pts)
Below Average
Paper was less than 2 pages long, and did not follow MLA format. Frequent mistakes in spelling, punctuation, andgrammar. (4 pts)
Unacceptable
Paper was only 1 page long. Did not have a works cited page, and is full of mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. (0 pts)
Comments
Score=_________
Keywords:
Writing, paper, technology, Fahrenheit 451
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.