Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Fair Research Paper 2011 rubric

iRubric: Science Fair Research Paper 2011 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Fair Research Paper 2011 
Science Fair Project
Sister Zakkiyya Witherspoon's rubric to assess student work and completion of science fair research paper
Rubric Code: W53476
By zrazaaq
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric Project Points
  Excellent

15 pts

Very Good

13 pts

Poor

10 pts

Unacceptable

5 pts

Testable Question

Excellent

Question/Topic is original, specific, measurable, and realistic.
Very Good

Question/Topic is not specific, measurable, and realistic.
Poor

Question/Topic is broad and/or unrealistic. Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Unacceptable

Question/Topic is missing or vague. It is clear that student has no idea about the purpose of the project or the scientific process.
Hypothesis

Excellent

Hypothesis is testable and directly relates to the purpose. At least two reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Very Good

Hypothesis is testable, directly relates to the purpose. One reason is given for making this hypothesis.
Poor

Hypothesis correlates to the purpose, but is difficult to test. No reasons are given for making the hypothesis.
Unacceptable

Hypothesis does not answer the research question and is not testable.
Materials and Procedure

Excellent

ALL required materials are listed. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed.
Very Good

Student included all items required. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed, but one or more steps are missing or confusing.
Poor

Student included most items required. Steps are logical, but somewhat confusing.
Unacceptable

Student did not list all necessary items, or use appropriate materials. Steps are not detailed or logical, and/or missing. It would be extremely difficult to follow or duplicate this experiment.
Results (data)/Log Book

Excellent

Multiple trials were performed.
Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 2 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Very Good

Multiple trials were performed. Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 1 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Poor

Only two trials were performed. Results are not easily interpreted and are represented in only 1 of following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Unacceptable

Only 1 trial was performed. It is unclear what the data represents without referring to the written results.
Conclusion

Excellent

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, and discusses possible explanations for results.
Very Good

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, showing an understanding of the scientific process.
Poor

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation, but leaves some confusion.
Unacceptable

Conclusion is confusing and/or does not answer the research question. Student does not attempt to explain if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Display Board/Graphics

Excellent

Display shows an obvious attention to detail and is decorated neatly. All steps of the Scientific process show a logical order. Student provided two or more appropriate graphics.
Very Good

Display shows some attention to detail and is neatly decorated. Most steps show a logical order. At least two appropriate graphics were used.
Poor

Display is decorated moderately neat. Parts of the Scientific process may be out of order or confusing. Student provided one or two appropriate graphics.
Unacceptable

Display is not neat and/or seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps of the Scientific process do not show a logical order. Appropriate graphics were not provided.
Islamic Relevance

Excellent

Student provides several pieces of Islamic information relevant to the research question. Student mentions at least one Muslim scientist and his contribution to the field of study
Very Good

Student mentions one hadith and quote from Quran. Student mentions the name of a Muslim scientist.
Poor

Student mentions only one piece of Islamic information.
Unacceptable

Student does not mention anything about Islam.
Overall content

Excellent

Student uses correct grammar, puntuation, and spelling throughtout the report. Report flows from one idea to the next. Content is correct and complete.
Very Good

Student has fewer than five mistakes in the report. Report jumpsfrom one idea to the next, but does display clear understanding of the project
Poor

Student have several mis spelled words, poor grammar and poor punctuation. Report does not flow and is difficult to understand.
Unacceptable

Report shows lack of effort and is unclear thoughout.



Keywords:
  • science fair

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178