Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Autobiographical Incident rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Autobiographical Incident
Autobiographical Incident
Students will use I Remember Statements, Life Maps and Childhood Photographs to draft Autobiographical Incident.
Rubric Code:
W43AB5
By
skelley42
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Autobiographical Incident
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
20 pts
Narrative Plot (20)
Poor
Piece will include plot, but events may be unclear or occur without purpose.
Fair
Piece will include clear plot that features a central conflict.
Good
Piece will include clear, focused plot that features a central conflict and resolution (or explanation of lack of resolution)
Tone (10)
Poor
Little evidence of purposeful tone exists.
Fair
Students will adopt a clear, consistent voice and assume a particular tone throughout the piece. Tone may be inconsistent.
Good
Students will adopt a clear, consistent voice and assume a particular tone throughout the piece.
Setting (15)
Poor
Setting details may be sparse, incomplete, or occur without purpose. Details do not enhance narrative.
Fair
Students use specific, focused details to construct setting and sense of place.
Good
Students use specific, focused details to construct setting and sense of place, establishing mood.
Dialogue (20)
Poor
Dialogue is missing or arbitrary and does not enhance narrative. Punctuation is incorrect or entirly missing.
Fair
Students construct meaningful dialogue. Some punctuation is correct.
Good
Students construct meaningful dialogue and punctuate correctly. Dialogue enhances narrative and understanding of character and plot.
Point of View (5)
Poor
Students use inconsistent first-person point of view throughout the piece.
Fair
Students adopt firs-person point of view and mostly remain consistent throughout the piece.
Good
Students adopt firs-person point of view and remain consistent throughout the piece.
Reflection (15)
Poor
Little reflection is included about personal growth or lessons learned.
Fair
In the piece, students discuss what they have learned about themselves/the world after thinking and writing about the experience.
Good
In the piece, students discuss what they have learned about themselves/the world after thinking and writing about the experience. Students consider how they have grown as family members/students/friends/employees, etc.
Character Development (15)
Poor
There is little evidence of character development.
Fair
Students use dialogue to develop primary characters.
Good
Students use dialogue, reflection, and internal/external conflict to develop primary characters.
Keywords:
Personal Narrative, Autobiographical Incident
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.