- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: A Guide to Practical Uses of a One-to-One Laptop Program rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
A Guide to Practical Uses of a One-to-One Laptop Program Rubric Code: W3CBCB By kushionjen Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Web 2.0 Tools in At-Risk Classroom
	Poor 1 pts	Developing 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts
Academic Success	Poor Students grades are poor, students are struggling with content knowledge/comprehension.	Developing Students grades in class have increased from previous terms. Students seem to have a better understanding of content.	Proficient Students are performing well on class assignments, students work is consistent during term. Students are mastering content.
Participation	Poor Students remain uninterested in content area and contributes little to no input into class via class discussion or through Web Tools.	Developing Students contribute to class discussions, are productive and willing to work in cooperative groups, and have an interest in activities occurring in class.	Proficient Students have taken ownership/pride in learning and class assignments. They have begun mentoring peers in the learning process. Actively contribute to class via face-to-face instruction and through Web Tools.
Attendance	Poor Students have poor attendance and are disinterested in or out of school.	Developing Students may have poor school attendance, although are prepared to work when they are at school and access/complete information via class wikis/blogs/websites/course management programs.	Proficient Students regularly attend class and are prepared to work when they arrive.
Quality of Student Work	Poor Students rarely complete assignments inline with guidelines and frequently have missing assignments.	Developing Students follow general guidelines.	Proficient Students produce quality assignments, follow guidelines given, and take pride in the work they complete.
Continued Use of Tools	Poor Instructor uses technology inconsistently and ineffectively.	Developing Instructor makes use of technology and Web 2.0 Tools frequently.	Proficient Instructor effectively uses available technology and Web 2.0 Tools regularly (several days a week).