Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Response to Formative Assessment Inquiry Experience rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Response to Formative Assessment Inquiry Experience
The rubric describes essential ingredients of how to reflect on and synthesize your learning from the Formative Assessment (mini)Inquiry assignment. Your response should synthesize your experiences by concentrating on the following components: 1) Identify 2-3 KEY IDEAS or components of your experience upon which to concentrate your reflection and discussion. 2) Clearly introduce the focus of your synthesis/reflection. 3) Clearly discuss the 2-3 key ideas. Tell us why they are important and provide enough detail, example, or extended explanation to demonstrate their importance and/or what you have learned. 4) Your discussion should demonstrate that you have reflected upon these key focal points. (Note: This reflection is part of the process of the overall assignment. If you have pulled out key points and have seriously reflected upon them, writing your synthesis response should be fairly easy)
Rubric Code:
W2AABC
By
jlynch12
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
4 pts
Exemplary
5 pts
Clarity of Focus
Poor
The focus is unclear to the reader, it may become clear by the end of the response, but the reader must do a significant amount of work to determine the main points that the author is trying to make.
Fair
The intro of the response refers to an unspecified task and the main points of the response are vague or unclear.
Good
In the intro the focus of the mini-inquiry and the main focal points of the response are generally clear in the response -- though some or all of it may not be explicitly stated.
Exemplary
In the intro, the response clearly states 1) The focus of the mini-inquiry or the main activity conducted during the mini-inquiry and 2) the the main focus points of the response.
Support
Poor
Support information is not related to and supportive of the topic/subject.
Fair
Support information has major weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject.
Good
Support information has minor weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject.
Exemplary
Support information is related to and supportive of the topic/subject.
Ideas & Content
Poor
Little focus is evident. Discussion is just a recounting of the process with almost no details or added information.
Fair
Two or three main ideas are clear, but elaboration consists of general and/or undeveloped details.
Good
Two or three key ideas related to the writer's experiences are clear. Elaboration consists of some specific details.
Exemplary
1. From his or her experience, the writer is able to pull out two or three focal ideas to explore and reflect on. 2 Discussion of the focal points is clear and supported by specific, developed details so that the reader can understand the importance of each.
The Reflective Process: SELF-ASSESS
Poor
This category is for the writer to self-asses. I don't really like to reflect. I have just a vague sense of the process/mini-inquiry project. This may because I was busy, or because I just went through the motions. For whatever reason, I barely reflected at all.
Fair
This category is for the writer to self-asses: I've pulled out some key "nuggets", but I did this when I sat down to write my synthesis and I did not spend too much time writing.
Good
This category is for the writer to self-asses: I have reflected on the process and what I've seen. I've pulled out key "nuggets" but spent just a bit of time reflecting on my experiences with them.
Exemplary
This category is for the writer to self-asses: I reflected carefully on what I experienced and devoted some time attention to reflecting--by thinking aloud, journaling, or discussing. I looked for connections across variables, between the readings and the processes of formative assessment and what I saw. I reflected sufficiently that I can see pull out "nuggets" that are worthy of further pursuit--about the students, teaching, assessment, or the process of self-inquiry.
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.