5 pts
4 pts
3 pts
2 pts
The explanation of the choice of methodology logically supports the inquiry/research question; supports chosen theoretical framework; three updated references justify the choice of methodology and design.
Description and explanation of participants (i.e. population, site, sample, and sample size) is provided in appropriate detail; permission needed to conduct study is explained; recruitment of participants is provided (how and why).
Type of measurement is identified; quality approach is explained as it relates to qualitative research (triangulation); process used to develop instrument is shared, and any potential issues are addressed; minimum of two references are included to justify the instrument used for the data collection.
Explanations are provided on the managing of the information collected (recording; note taking; any additional data collected); interview guide demonstrates question technique and respect of participant; security of data is addressed.
Information on data analysis process is communicated; strategies listed correspond with theoretical framework; use of lit review/theoretical framework to help establish emerging themes.
Potential challenges/limitations are discussed in relation to future findings (i.e. sample availability; sites; research design; and data collection instrument).
Articulation of ethics process; level of risk to participant explained; TCPS 2 awareness communicated.
Chart of potential timeline leading to spring symposium provided.
Brief recap of inquiry question, theoretical framework and research methodology provided; potential implications of study outlined.
Writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; paper is within the page limitation(6-8 pages); APA format followed with proper in text citation and reference list; use of professional language.