Skip to main content
iRubric: Chinese Presentation- Peer review rubric

iRubric: Chinese Presentation- Peer review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Chinese Presentation- Peer review 
Chinese Storyboard Presentation- Peer review
Novice (WL.CM3.N) Present information in culturally appropriate ways on very familiar common daily topics using memorized words, phrases, and simple sentences through spoken, written, or signed language. Use the most suitable media and technologies to present and publish. (California Department of Education (2019)
Rubric Code: W239XB7
By MuMeiHsueh
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Storyboard Rubric
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

80 pts

Fair

60 pts

Needs Improvement

40 pts

Your Score

(N/A)

Project Content
Content

Excellent

My peer shows understanding of common daily topic, and provides all relevant details to a high standard.

Content includes:
- name
- age/ birthday
- nationality
- job
- hobby
Good

My peer shows some understanding of common daily topic and provides relevant details.

Content includes:
- name
- age/ birthday
- nationality
- job
- hobby
Fair

My peer shows some understanding of common daily topic but there may be some gaps in detail.

Content includes:
- name
- age/ birthday
- nationality
- job
- hobby
Needs Improvement

My peer dose not show enough understanding of common daily topic, and there are many gaps in detail.

Content includes:
- name
- age/ birthday
- nationality
- job
- hobby
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Quality of Writing

Grammar, character writing, and Punctuation
Excellent

My peer's slide contains a high standard of written language and understanding is seamless.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Good

My peer's slide contains a good standard of written language, with some errors, but does not affect understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Fair

My peer's slide contains a fair standard of written language, with some errors that may cause difficulty in understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Needs Improvement

My peer's slide contains a written language with frequent and distracting errors, making it difficult in understanding.

Quality of writing includes:
- Accurate punctuation (inc. commas where necessary, and end punctuation)
- A range of mostly accurate grammar structures
- Relevant and accurate vocabulary
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Presentation Delivery
Fluency and Pronunciation

Pronunciation/Dialogue
Excellent

- My peer speaks clearly and uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she does not relies or read from the notes.
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are mostly correct.
Good

- My peer speaks clearly most of the time and sometimes uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she occasionally relies or reads from the notes (fewer than 4 times)
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are usually accurate.
Fair

- My peer speaks clearly some of the time but rarely uses his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she frequently relies or reads from the notes (more than 5 times)
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation are frequently inaccurate and often difficult to understand.
Needs Improvement

- My peer dose not speak clearly and rarely use his/her voice to emphasize important information.
- He/she relies or read from the notes almost all the time.
- His/her sounds and tones of pronunciation is mostly inaccurate and my speech is almost always difficult to understand.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 20

Comments:
Visual Elements

Excellent

- All images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Slides and visual elements are visually appealing.
- Slides are formatted well and very easy to read and understand.
Good

- Most images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Slides and visual elements are mostly visually appealing.
- Slides are mostly formatted well but give little difficulty in reading and understanding.
Fair

- Some images are relevant and effective in showcasing his/her ideas.
- Some slides and visual elements are visually appealing, but may be too small.
- Slides are sometimes not formatted well and give some difficulty in reading and understanding.
Needs Improvement

- Images are often not relevant and do not support his/her ideas.
- Some slides and visual elements may be unsuitable or too small.
- Slides are mostly not formatted well and are difficult to read and understand.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:
Groupwork
Time Management

Excellent

- He/she used class time effectively to focus on the project, and no class time was wasted.
- He/she completed all parts of the project within the time limit.
Good

- He/she used most class time effectively on the project, , only a little class time was wasted.
- He/she completed all parts of the project within the time limit.
Fair

- He/she used most class time effectively on the project, but some time was wasted due to distractions.
- He/she completed most parts of the project within the time limit.
Needs Improvement

- He/she used minimal class time effectively on the project, and a lot of time was wasted through distractions.
- His/her project was not completed within the time limit.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:
Reflection

Excellent

He/she completed a peer- review to a high standard, including all required parts:

Requirements:
- At least 5 sentences.
- At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Good

He/she completed a peer- review including all required parts:

Requirements:
- At least 5 sentences.
- At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Fair

He/she completed a peer-review, but may have missed some parts:

Requirements:
-At least 5 sentences.
-At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Needs Improvement

He/she did not complete a peer-review, or did not include many parts:

Requirements:
-At least 5 sentences.
-At least 2 references from other group’s storyboards on what they did well.
- How they can improve their own storyboard.
Your Score

Points given: ________ / 10

Comments:






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202