Skip to main content

iRubric: Anatomy and Physiology Case Study Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Anatomy and Physiology Case Study Presentation 
Students will research and present a case study of a disorder, disease, or illness related to the skeletal system.
Rubric Code: W22C7AW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Criteria
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

2 pts

(-) Effort

0 pts

Overall Delivery

Organization, Creativity, Engaging

Excellent

Presentation is excellent, extremely organized, interesting, creative, and easy to follow. Demonstrates originality.
Good

Presentation is clear and understandable, interesting, and organized.
Fair

Presentation is fairly organized, slightly engaging.
Poor

Presentation is unclear, unorganized, unengaging, difficult to follow.
(-) Effort

Did not present material to class.
Visual Aids

Development, Use, Relevancy, Enhancing

Excellent

Excellent development and use of multiple visual aids. Visual aids were relevant and enhanced learning.
Good

Good use and development of visual aids. Visual aid(s) enhanced the presentation and related to the material.
Fair

Adequate use of at least one visual aid. Visual aid slightly enhanced the presentation. Poor development of visual aids. Questionable relevancy.
Poor

Poor visual aids, did not enhance/relate to topic.
(-) Effort

No forms of visual aids presented.
Content

Provides enough information for peers to answer the question posed, which was, "How does this disease/disorder relate to the skeletal system". Plus, presenter added an engaging and fun challenge for the 2 Truths and a Lie component of the assignment.

Excellent

Information presented is accurate and appropriately related. The two truths and a lie challenge was engaging, fun, and obviously designed to help peers assess the content as well as to help the presenter assess their success of providing instruction of the content.
Good

Information presented is accurate and somewhat appropriately related. The two truths and a lie challenge was engaging, fun, and somewhat designed to help peers assess the content as well as to help the presenter assess their success of providing instruction of the content.
Fair

Inaccurate information is minimal.The two truths and a lie challenge was included but was neither engaging or fun, and did not seem to be designed to help peers assess the content as well as to help the presenter assess their success of providing instruction of the content.
Poor

Presentation is riddled with inaccuracies and a lack of thoroughness.The two truths and a lie challenge was included but not related to the topic.
(-) Effort

No content was covered in this presentation, or all information presented was inaccurate. Did not include the two truths and a lie post presentation assessment.
Grading Criteria
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

(-) Effort

0 pts

Professional Speaking

Eye Contact, Enthusiasm, Audible

Excellent

Excellent eye contact, showed enthusiasm through entire presentation, and was easily understood. Spoke about subject with authority and ease.
Good

Maintained eye contact and showed enthusiasm most of the time. Voice was clear and understandable, minimal fillers used. Appeared calm, had a general grasp of information.<BR>
Minimal reliance on notes.
Fair

Occasionally used eye contact. Difficult to hear, excessively used "ums" or other fillers. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading, reliance on notes.
Poor

No or minimal eye contact. Voice was inaudible, mumbled, or otherwise not understood. Did not seem to know the material. Heavy reliance on notes.
(-) Effort

Did not speak/present.
Topic

Relevancy, Correlation

Excellent

Disease/illness correlates to an appropriate system covered in this course. Chosen topic requires research and in-depth discovery.
Good

Disease/illness correlates to an appropriate system. Topic selected requires minimal research.
Fair

Disease/illness correlates to a system not covered in this course.
Poor

There is no correlation between a disease/illness and a body system. Presentation is completed on an inappropriate, unrelated topic.
(-) Effort

Did not research and present a topic.
Time

Presentation of content = 5 minutes with time for Q & A.

Excellent

Presentation used the time well in that at least
5 minutes was devoted to content with an additional 2 minutes allowed for questions and answers.

Excellent use of time.
Good

Presentation took
5 minutes of time with most of the time devoted to content.

1-2 minutes allowed for questions and answers.

Time was well used.
Fair

Only 3 - 4 minutes was devoted to content.

Less than 1 minute was allowed for questions and answers.

Time was not well used.
Poor

Total Presentation lasts between 2 and 5 minutes, or needs to be stopped by the instructor due to excessive time.
(-) Effort

Presentation lasted between 0 and 2 minutes.
Peer Review

This will be determined by reaction/feedback sheets.

Excellent

Presentation helped me learn about several of the topics included in my outline of chapter on the Muscular System.
Good

Presentation helped me learn about one of the topics addressed in the outline for the chapter on the Muscular System.
Fair

Presentation mentioned information related to the outline for the chapter on the Muscular System but I didn't learn anything new.
Poor

None of the information presented was related to the outline for the chapter on the Muscular System.
(-) Effort

Class did not assign any points to the presenter for the project/presentation.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n79