Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Honors Poetry Portfolio Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Honors Poetry Portfolio Rubric
Honors Poetry Portfolio Rubric
Honors Poetry Portfolio: This project is the final assessment in the unit of Poetry. This is a two week task wherein students compile original poetry done in class showcasing the use of imagery, sound effects and rhyming, etc. Poems showcase various poetry styles learned, plus free verse poetry of the student.
Rubric Code:
VXW98C4
By
marystowell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Honors Poetry Portfolio Rubric
Beginning
50-59%
(N/A)
Developing
60-69%
(N/A)
Established
70-79%
(N/A)
Excelling
80-100%
(N/A)
Requirements 50 pts.
Beginning
90% of the portfolio doesn't not meet the criteria required for the project. The daily checklist was not filled out. The portfolio cover/ thematic art is not evident or well thought out.
Developing
The portfolio is missing most of the required content or student didn't follow the required format. The daily checklist was semi filled out. The portfolio cover/ thematic art is messy, not well planned.
Established
The portfolio is missing 1-2 of the required content or format. The daily checklist was mostly filled out. The portfolio cover/ thematic art is mostly planned.
Excelling
The portfolio meets 100% of the required content and format. The daily checklist was completely filled out. The portfolio cover/thematic art is fully planned significant.
Originality 50 pts.
Beginning
Work appears to be thoughtless or rushed. Work is very repetitive and ideas seem cliched, impersonal or unoriginal. Poems do not meet requirements.
Developing
The poems are creative, but don't demonstrate a variety of approaches. Poems are not varied and do not meet most of the requirements.
Established
Poems are creative and thoughtful. They are carefully written, but development or craft could go further. Most poems meet requirements.
Excelling
Poems are creative and original. It is evident that the poet put thought into their words and innovatively conveyed their ideas and emotions. Poems meet all requirements.
Literary Devices/Fig. lang. 50 pts.
Beginning
The poems did not include any literary devices such as imagery, sound effects and rhyming pattern. No figurative language was uses such as simile, metaphor.
Developing
The poems use some literary devices and figurative language.
Established
The poems incorporate several literary devices and figurative language which demonstrate creativity.
Excelling
The portfolio demonstrates varied and appropriate application of literary devices and figurative language discussed in class.
Poetry Reflection & Synthesis 25 pt
Beginning
Limited poetry elements are identified or described. The student shows no personality and this portion of the project is incomplete. None of the required components are incorporated.
Developing
Some poetry elements are identified and described. The student shows some personality and this portion of the project is described in some detail. Length is not met. Some of the required components are incorporated.
Established
Many poetry elements are identified and described. The student shows his/her personality and this portion of the project is described with many details demonstrating understanding of poetry. Length is mostly met. Most of the required components are incorporated.
Excelling
Many poetry elements are identified and described in great detail. The student's personality comes through the project. The student has taken the assignment and clearly has completed it in a unique form demonstrating his/her depth of poetry. Length is met. All is incorporated.
Grammar & Punctuation 25 pts.
Beginning
There are numerous spelling, diction, or grammar errors in the poems and/or paragraphs.
Developing
The poet's intended meaning is muddled by some spelling, diction or grammar errors in the poems and/or paragraphs.
Established
Some spelling, diction or grammar mistakes are evident, but do not diminish meaning in poems and/or paragraphs.
Excelling
Proper use of modern English spelling, diction and grammar are employed consistently throughout portfolio.
Peer Review/Revision 50 pts.
Beginning
The poet provides no evidence of peer review. The poet provides no evidence of revision.
Developing
The poet provides evidence of one or two peer review session. Questions do not go beyond, "Is it good?", "Do you like it?", or "Fix my grammar errors."Poet revises poem based solely on grammatical errors.
Established
The poet provides evidence of three peer review sessions. Questions begin to address poetry techniques, such as rhythm, rhyme, and imagery.Poet provides evidence of one or two revisions based on content, form, and poetic devices.
Excelling
The poet provides evidence of all peer review sessions. Questions address poetry techniques, such as rhythm, rhyme, and imagery.Poet provides evidence of multiple revisions and a willingness to experiment with form, content, and poetic devices.
Attractiveness/Neatness 25 pts.
Beginning
The poems and portfolio are messy or disorganized. Images are not included or related and does not enhance the project. The project was not in a folder or put together correctly.
Developing
The poems and portfolio show some thoughtfulness in their presentation. Images were not related or included but were used to enhance the presentation of the project. The folder is destroyed and not put together totally.
Established
The poems and portfolio are attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness and 1-2 images are included but not related to the poems. Overall presentation is good. The project was in a folder but it was semi-destroyed and put together mostly correctly.
Excelling
The portfolio is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness. All images used are related to the poems and enhances the overall presentation of the portfolio.The portfolio was submitted in a folder and put together correctly.
Biography/Dedication 25 pts.
Beginning
No poet biography is included. No dedication is included.
Developing
Poet biography and/or dedication is sparse and hastily written.
Established
Poet biography is adequate, but may be unimaginative, short, or unrelated to the writings in the portfolio.
Dedication is not related to the portfolio.
Excelling
Poet biography is clever, interesting, and well thought out. The writer took care to create a bio that served its intended purpose, which is to shed light on the writings in the portfolio. The dedication is thoughtful and meaningful.
Bonus Points
Beginning
Developing
Established
Excelling
Keywords:
Poem, poetry, portfolio
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.