iRubric: Group Presentations regarding Survey Responses rubric

All group members are identified within the slide. A picture of the group or of something representing the school is included.
The title of the presentation is clear and represents the purpose of the presentation.
The use of color is catching and font is easy to read.

All group members are identified within the slide.The title of the presentation is clear and represents the purpose of the presentation.
The use of color is catching and font is easy to read.
No picture of group members or facility.

All group members are identified within the slide.The title of the presentation is clear and represents the purpose of the presentation. Color and use of font was minimal in effectiveness. No images on slide.

The title of the presentation included. Group members names were not included. Creativity at a minimum.

No clear title or purpose explaining the presentation. Minimal effort given. Very underwhelming.

Notes:







Score = ________

Students made sure that the number of surveys sent v. the number of responses was included. Students used graphics (pie graphs, etc) to help explain the results of the student survey. There is no question as to what the group was presenting and what their information was
Well organized.

Students made sure that the number of surveys sent v. the number of responses was included. Students used graphics (pie graphs, etc) to help explain the results of the student survey. The purpose of the presentation was pretty clear.

Students made sure that the number of surveys sent v. the number of responses was included. Students used graphics (pie graphs, etc) to help explain the results of the student survey.
Survey purpose was understood but information was lacking to support their presentation.

Presentation covered broad issues of student responses. Not well organized. Somewhat confusing as to what the purpose was.

Not really sure how many surveys there were; how many responses there were. No graphics used to support information. Unclear. Unorganized.
Poor effort overall.

Notes:









Score = ________

Information presented in logical and sequential order. Headings and subheadings on slides made sense. Presentation easy to understand. Seemed like the group went above & beyond of what was expected.

Information presented in logical and sequential order. Headings and subheadings on slides made sense. Presentation easy to understand.

The organization of the presentation was good. There were some areas that could have been reorganized to make the presentation flow better but not a bad effort.

The organization of the presentation was good. Nothing out of the ordinary but made sense, overall.

What organization? The slides seemed out of order and random. Presentation difficult to follow and/or understand. Yikes.

Notes:








Score = ________

Last slide wrapped up the entire presentation in a succinct, organized, professional manner. Entire presentation looks "Board ready." Impressive work!

Last slide wrapped up entire presentation but did not leave the audience wanting more or feeling wowed. Everything was covered; just not a "wow!"

Last slide kind of wrapped up the entire presentation. Seemed a bit unorganized and rushed.

Last slide was there with some information but did not offer anything of value to the presentation. Almost seemed like presenters were not sure what to do with the slide!

Last slide did not really accomplish anything other than being the last slide. No effort.

Notes:







Score = _________

Use of color and fonts were great. Easy to read. Looked professional. Large enough that entire room could see and understand the slides. Not cluttered, not too bare....just right! :)

Use of color was great. Some fonts difficult to read. At least there was some variation in presentation. Good effort!

Font and color stayed the same throughout the entire presentation. So, so.....

Colors were not good for a visual presentation. Font difficult to read. Made the presentation difficult to follow.

Both the colors and the font(s) chosen made the presentation a visual catastrophe! Needed to rework most slides to make it legible. Poor effort.

Notes:






Score =