Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Capstone Group Project: Analysis of a Language rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Capstone Group Project: Analysis of a Language
Create Your Own Ending Group Project
Create the following assignment within your small group communities: You will have multiple class periods to work on the assignment but you will also have to assign responsibilities to individuals to complete outside of class in order to complete the assignment successfully. Each group will receive a group grade as well as an individual grade. Your assignment is to analyze a language in the local area. You will write this in the form of an individual research paper which will be linked to the papers of your colleagues. You will then integrate the pieces and present it to the class as a lesson. After selecting the language, the group will decide which element of the laguage each person will analyze (i.e., phon., morph., syntax, cultural elements). You should hand in the plan of the group, significant contributions and who made them, a personal log of your own daily contributions to the group, and your individual research paper & lesson plan.
Rubric Code:
VX5C97
By
bonitajaros
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Group Work
Needs Improvement
10 pts
Fair
20 pts
Distinctive
30 pts
Group Plan
Needs Improvement
The group does not have a clear plan of individual contributions inside and outside of class and/or sharing of information, and there is no plan for adherence to timelines.
Fair
The group has a plan but individual members do not have clarity about individual responsibilities inside and outside of class, procedures for sharing information, or timelines.
Distinctive
The group has a coherent plan for each person in the group inside and outside of class, including assignment of specific element of language analysis (i.e., phonology, morpholohgy, syntax, culutral elements); a timeline for research work, sharing and writing.
Research & Documentation
Needs Improvement
The group does not keep timelines on research gathering and documentation, does not have correct documentation style, or does not choose appropriate sources.
Fair
The group has insufficient sources and/or inappropriate documentation style.
Distinctive
The group keeps timelines and has appropriate sources that are correctly documented.
Group Dynamics
Needs Improvement
The group did not work well due to insufficient communication outside of class, frequent absences, or members did not provide research elements on time.
Fair
The group worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive
The group worked well together as a group, each person contributed and had a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for teaching demonstration.
Individual Work in Group
Needs Improvement
10 pts
Fair
20 pts
Distinctive
30 pts
Fulfilment of Role
Needs Improvement
Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time.
Fair
General contribution to group information gathering and discussions; some help in preparation for teaching demonstration; little participation in Blackboard activities; did not complete all tasks on time.
Distinctive
Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, completed all individual assignments.
Individual Log
Needs Improvement
Very few entries, did not contribute much to the overall product.
Limited description of role, did not discuss positive aspects or things which could have been improved.
Fair
Some entries, general descriptions of contributions; meager discussion of what could have been improved.
Distinctive
Many entries, detailed descriptions of contributions and reflection of role that indicates both positive aspects of role and things that could have been improved.
Lesson Plan
Needs Improvement
10 pts
Fair
20 pts
Distinctive
30 pts
Learning Outcomes/Objectives
Needs Improvement
Learning Outcomes and objectives are not clear and/or there are too many. This impacted the procedures and evaluation sections.
Fair
Learning outcomes and objectives are somewhat clear, but procedures can not be clearly linked.
Distinctive
Learning outcomes and objectives are clear and doable, so the procedures and materials chosen connect well.
Procedures & Materials
Needs Improvement
Pocedures are incpomplete and materials section may be missiing.
Fair
The procedures have reasonable sequence but may be difficult to execute due to lack of clarity. Materials may not fit.
Distinctive
Procedures are clear and sequenced properly. As a result, materials fit the procedures.
Assessment
Needs Improvement
The assessment is not linked to the objectives, so the students will be confused.
Fair
The assessment is somewhat linked to the objectives, but the format may not be clear.
Distinctive
The assessment is clearly linked to the objectives, so the students will be clear what to do.
Group Teaching Demonstration
Needs Improvement
20 pts
Fair
40 pts
Distinctive
60 pts
Presentation Format
Needs Improvement
No creativity in presentation: no clear objectives in lesson, not all group members have a role, no evidence of planning or preparation for an integrated presentation, group members simply present their papers one at a time. Delivery is inaudible or distracting.
Fair
Shows evidence of some creative preparation: Some evidence of lesson objectives, group members have a role in the demonstration, but presentation is only somehwhat integrated, interaction with the class is limited. Delivery imay not be completely clear.
Distinctive
Creative integrated presentation format with obvious prior preparation and clear objectives for lesson plan: Clear role for all members of the group; obvious interaction with class. delivery is clear. .
Visuals
Needs Improvement
The visuals do not enhance the presentation because they are difficult to see or distracting, and they are not appropriate for the objectives of the lesson.
Fair
The visuals are appropriate but they may not be easily seen. The presenter does not utilize the materials during hte presentation.
Distinctive
The visuals enhance the presentation. They are easily seen and used appropriately.
Assessment
Needs Improvement
The assessment is not linked to the objectives of the lesson. No feedback is given by the presenter.
Fair
The assessment is somewhat linked to hthe objectives.
Distinctive
The assessment is clearly linked to the objectives, and the students are clear how to respond. Feedback is given by the presenter.
Research Paper
Needs Improvement
40 pts
Fair
70 pts
Distinctive
100 pts
Content
Needs Improvement
There is a lack of understanding of terminology and/or concepts; therefore, the language in question is not analyzed correctly.
Fair
There is basic understanding of terminology and concepts, but the language in question is not completely analyzed correctly because of misapplication of those concepts or terms.
Distinctive
There is clear application of terminology and concepts, and the language in question is analyzed accurately.
Organization
Needs Improvement
There is a lack of a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement which causes the body of the paper to be incoherent and/or lack unity. The conclusion is repetitive or lacking.
Fair
The introduction is somewhat clear, and there is a thesis statement; however, there may be a lack of specificity which causes the body of the paper to lack coherence and/or unity. There is a weak conclusion.
Distinctive
There is a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement. The body of the paper clearly explains the elements of the thesis. A conclusion which does not simply repeat the introduction is presented.
Grammar and Mechanics
Needs Improvement
Sentence-level grammatical and mechanical errors intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the paper. Documentation style is incorrect.
Fair
Grammatical and mechanical errors do not intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the essay; however, sentence-level errors are numerous. Documentation style may not be correct.
Distinctive
There is grammatical control, and mechanical errors are few. Documentation style is correct.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.