Skip to main content

iRubric: PowerPoint Presentation of Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
PowerPoint Presentation of Research Paper 
PowerPoint Presentation of Research Paper
Rubric Code: VX58547
By jscott0727
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project/Presentation
Informative Research Paper/PowerPoint/Physical Project Presentation
  4

Distinguished

(N/A)

3

Above Mastery

(N/A)

2

Mastery

(N/A)

1

Below Mastery

(N/A)

0

No attempt except research in class.

(N/A)

Technology/aesthetics:
20 %

Appropriate presentation tool selected;Professional look; presentation tool used correctly;
4

Student successfully selected and employed a presentation tool for delivery of physical project. Few "glitches" in technology use demonstrated student's true understanding of tool.The work done exceeds expectations and shows that the student is proud of his/her work
3

Student selected and employed a workable presentation tool for delivery of physical project. Few "glitches" in technology use demonstrated student's understanding of tool. The work was done with good effort that shows the necessary level of student competence. It is evident that time was put into this presentation.
2

Student could have selected and employed a more appropriate presentation tool for delivery of physical project . Several "glitches" in technology use demonstrated student's lack of thorough understanding of tool. Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not the necessary level of the student. It is evident that the work was rushed.
1

Student "settled" for a simple presentation tool for delivery of physical project, providing evidence of lack of effort to find BEST too. Many "glitches" in technology use demonstrated student's true understanding of tool. Work is done with little effort; quality is not to the level required by the student. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
0

The student did not do a physical project presentation.
Mechanics/grammar:
20 %

Correct MLA format, correct punctuation, spelling and grammar
4

The presentation of physical project has fewer than 5 errors in MLA format, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
3

The presentation of physical project has 6 to 8 errors in MLA format, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
2

The presentation of physical project has 9 to 10 errors in MLA format, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
1

The PowerPoint has too many mistakes in MLA format, punctuation, spelling and grammar. The slides are difficult to read therefore.
0

The student did not do a physical project presentation.
Information/content:
30 %

Correct;Ordered effectively; Sources cited;
4

The student presented the information clearly and displayed a complete understanding of his/her research topic. It is evident that the student was well prepared. Information was correct; ordered effectively; sources cited correctly.
3

For the most part, the student presented the information clearly and displayed a reasonable understanding of his/her research topic. Information was correct; ordered effectively; Very few mistakes in citing sources.
2

The information presented was not adequate and/or complete. The student somewhat understood his/her research topic. Information was correct; ordered somewhat effectively; sources cited correctly on most occasions.
1

Not enough information presented to show that the student understood or learned his/her research topic. What information was provided was correct; ordered somewhat effectively; some sources cited were correctly.
0

The student did not do a physical project presentation.
Content Delivery
30 %

Eye contact; No reading from cards or slides; professional appearance as suited to topic; Speech volume is appropriate; Speech is clear and speed of speaking is appropriate.
4

Excellent eye contact with audience and judges; spoke fluently and does not read from note cards/screen; professional appearance as suited to topic; speech volume was appropriate; Speech was clear and speed of speaking was appropriate.




Fluency - not reading
3

Acceptable amount of eye contact with audience and judges; spoke fluently, but depended on notecards/screen to some extent. Did not read word-for-word;professional appearance as suited to topic; speech volume was appropriate; Speech was clear and speed of speaking was appropriate.
2

Insufficient amount of eye contact with audience and judges; spoke fluently, but depended on notecards/screen to some extent, but did not read word-for-word; professional appearance as suited to topic; speech volume could have been louder/softer; Speech lacked clarity; speed of speaking was appropriate
1

Little, if any, eye contact with audience and judges; speech was not smooth;Totally depended on notecards/screen--read word-for-word; appearance was less than suited to topic; speech volume could have been louder/softer; Speech lacked clarity; speed of speaking was appropriate
0

The student did not do a physical project presentation.



Keywords:
  • ENG 117/Fall 2012/Trincellito



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n67