Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4
Interview Comparisons
Conduct qualitative interviews, summarize data, analysis of findings, ethical concerns in researching LAMC students.
Rubric Code:
VX49A59
By
proflevym
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Interview
Poor
1 pts
Acceptable
3 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Topic, goal, selection
Poor
Student failed to discuss their topic, goal, how selected respondents, sampling technique.
Acceptable
Student discussed most of their topic, goal, how selected respondents, their sampling technique.
Excellent
Student discussed all their topic, goal and how they selected respondents and their sampling technique.
Methodology/ problems
Poor
Student failed to discuss time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Acceptable
Student adequately discussed time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Excellent
Student discussed all the details time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Techniques/Rapport
Poor
Student failed to discuss techniques they used or rapport during their interviews.
Acceptable
Student adequately discussed techniques they used or rapport during their interviews.
Excellent
Student discussed the techniques they used in great depth during interviews
Findings
Poor
Student failed to discuss findings, theories, comments.
Acceptable
Student adequately discussed their findings, theories and comments.
Excellent
Student discussed their findings, theories and comments to great depth.
Ethical Concerns
Poor
Student did not address any ethical concerns before, during or after interviews.
Acceptable
Student did address some ethical concerns of student interviews.
Excellent
Student did addressed all ethical concerns of student interviews.
Conclusions
Poor
Student failed to discuss data in depth, its meaning or their conclusions.
Acceptable
Student adequately discussed data in depth, its meaning and their conclusions.
Excellent
Student discussed the data in depth, its meaning, what they would tell an audience and their conclusions.
Research Analysis/Opinion
Poor
Student failed to discuss improvements to their research or their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Acceptable
Student discussed some improvements to their research or some opinion on research assignment.
Excellent
Student properly discussed improvements and their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Field Notes
Poor
Missing/Too short
Acceptable
Minimum requirements met.
Excellent
Very thorough detailed field notes.
Writing Quality
Poor
Poor writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper
Acceptable
Satisfactory writing but some grammar, spelling errors.
Excellent
Overall writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper was excellent with very few spelling errors.
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.