- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WRT204: Rhetorical Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WRT204: Rhetorical Analysis Food Film Analysis This is an analysis of two Pop Culture Artifacts, using the five dimensions of cultural potency from our textbook. Rubric Code: VX24384 By schmidtp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Qualities and Criteria
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 17 pts	Fair 15 pts	Poor 10 pts
Brief Summary of Artifacts	Excellent -Gives reader a clear understanding of the artifacts along with the main points in an appropriate amount of space	Good -Gives detailed explanation of the artifacts	Fair -Gives a general idea of the artifacts but lacks in clarity	Poor -Does not give reader a summary of the artifacts
Analysis of Artifact 1	Excellent -Provides evidence of cricital thinking while relating the terminology of analysis	Good -Provides new perspective and relation to the issues addressed in the course	Fair -Uses some basic course terminology but limited critical thinking about the text's purpose	Poor -Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occurred in the text
Analysis of Artifact 2	Excellent -Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the text	Good -Good overall reaction is presented -Reflection of what was personally learned from the text and the relation to the course	Fair -Some reflection but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the text	Poor -No personal reaction included -Inappropriate use of reflection taking up majority of the paper
Format of Paper	Excellent -Very clear and organized ideas -Strong presentation of paper outline -MLA/APA Format is followed -AT LEAST THREE sources are used	Good -Outline is clear in presentation of ideas -Some minor MLA/APA issues - ONLY TWO sources are used	Fair -Some outline attempted in organization of ideas -Unclear transitions to new ideas -Several MLA/APA issues - ONLY ONE source is used	Poor - Does not follow an organized outline of ideas - Length is not met - Does not follow MLA/APA format - NO outside sources are used.
Mechanics	Excellent -Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors -Limited punctuation errors	Good -Generally appropriate usage of grammar and punctuation -Evidence of spell check used	Fair -Spelling errors -Several grammatical errors -Punctuation errors	Poor -Many spelling errors -Difficulty understanding ideas due to improper grammar -Significant punctuation errors