Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Olympic Athlete Profile & Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Olympic Athlete Profile & Presentation
Sports Invitation en francais
You will create a Smart Notebook presentation on a Canadian Olympic athlete after conducting research on them. Expectations will vary based on grade level.
Rubric Code:
VC235W
By
owenmcguire
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Written evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Very Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Comments
(N/A)
Mechanics and structure
Poor
Many errors, little sentence structure; hard/ impossible to understand due to grammar mistakes. No use of learned writing strategies evident.
Needs Improvement
Hard to understand due to grammar mistakes; few complex sentences. Very limited use of writing strategies.
Good
Frequent errors which do not hinder communication; occasional complex sentences. Some use of writing strategies.
Very Good
Some errors in grammar, spelling or syntax; several complex sentences. Use of writing strategies is evident.
Excellent
Excellent; very few or no errors in grammar, spelling, syntax (word order); many complex sentences. Seamless application of writing strategies.
Comments
Vocabulary
Poor
Inadequate or subject-inappropriate; difficult or impossible to understand. No use of subject vocabulary.
Needs Improvement
Limited to basic words and/or repetitive; often inaccurate and confusing. Very limited use of subject vocabulary.
Good
Functional; fails to communicate complete meaning. Some use of subject vocabulary.
Very Good
Level appropriate vocabulary used. Some initiative taken when accessing online and class resources.
Excellent
Precise, varied, excellent for level. Initiative taken to access online and class resources.
Comments
Content/Use of SmartN.
Poor
Misleading; evident that students did not follow instructions. Only some basic text in the presentation.
Needs Improvement
Some content is present but may be inaccurate/incorrect. Basic text present, some symbols and graphics used to enhance presentation.
Good
Understandable and most of appropriate content is present. Symbols and graphics used on most slides to enhance presentation.
Very Good
All assigned questions are answered. Symbols and graphics are present and are used appropriately.
Excellent
Rich, engaging. Every assigned question is answered with extra details. Many symbols and graphics used to enhance presentation. Very professional.
Comments
Group Work
Poor
Students did not work cohesively as a group. Conflicts were constantly resolved by Monsieur.
Needs Improvement
Students were rarely able to work together cohesively. Many conflicts were resolved by Monsieur.
Good
Students were able to work together cohesively most of the time. Some conflicts occurred but most were resolved by the students.
Very Good
Students worked well together and any conflicts that occurred were resolved independently.
Excellent
Students worked very well together. They were able to evenly divide work and take the initiative to work out any disagreements among themselves.
Comments
Oral Presentation
Poor
Students were not able to present a final product. What is presented is incomplete/confusing.
Needs Improvement
Students were able to present a less than partially completed final product. Few questions are answered.
Good
Students presented a
final product that answered a majority of the questions but with some major errors.
Very Good
Students made a presentation that answered all questions fully. Some minor errors but overall a good presentation.
Excellent
Presentation is flawless. All questions are answered with an extremely low number of errors. Prior practice by students is obvious.
Comments
Keywords:
Research/Oral Presentation of Written Work
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.