iRubric: Restaurant Review rubric

Contains all parts discussed in class (title, characters, setting, plot, three mood changes, flashbacks, and writer's opinion) and are CLEARLY expressed.

Contains all parts discussed in class (title, characters, setting, plot, three mood changes, flashbacks, and writer's opinion) and are not always clearly expressed.

1 part discussed in class is missing or incomplete (title, characters, setting, plot, three mood changes, flashbacks, and writer's opinion).

2 or more parts discussed in class are missing or incomplete (title, characters, setting, plot, three mood changes, flashbacks, and writer's opinion).

Multiple parts discussed in class are missing or incomplete (title, characters, setting, plot, three mood changes, flashbacks, and writer's opinion).

All parts are answered in complete sentences, have a capital letter and ending punctuation, and few misspelled words.

Most parts are answered in complete sentences, have a capital letter and ending punctuation, and some misspelled words.

Some parts are answered in complete sentences, have a capital letter and ending punctuation, and some misspelled words.

Parts are not often answered in complete sentences, are missing many capital letters and ending punctuation, and many misspelled words.

Parts are not answered in complete sentences, are missing capital letters and ending punctuation, and many misspelled words.

Proficient
i.e. Review is specific to restaurant in which they ate and directly comments on food, speed of service, cleanliness, etc. Author adequately describes restaurant examples.

Strong
Author fully conveys restaurant experience to readers and uses concrete examples from visit in review.

Basic
Author offers little insight into restaurant experience. Proficient

Weak
Author offers no insight into overall experience at restaurant. Offers no feedback to future visitor.

The reader has a problem knowing whether to spend money to eat at the establishment.