Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Teaching a Math Lesson rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Teaching a Math Lesson
Rubric Code:
V6A9W9
By
julieclaxton
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Math
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Teaching
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Total
(N/A)
Organization
Excellent
Lesson is presented in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Has all the parts of the lesson - essential question, warm up, mini-lesson, work session and closing. 15 pts)
Good
Lesson is presented in logical sequence which audience can follow. Has all the parts of the lesson, but not presented in order. (8-14 pts)
Fair
Audience has difficulty following presentation because group jumps around. Is missing one part of the lesson. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. Is missing 2 or more parts of the lesson. (0-4 pts)
Total
Math Content/Knowledge
Excellent
Group demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions and explanations and elaboration. (15 pts.)
Good
Group is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. (8-14 pts)
Fair
Group is uncomfortable with information is able to answer only rudimentary questions. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Group does not have grasp of information; cannot answer questions about subject. (0-4 pts)
Total
Visuals
Excellent
Visuals explain and reinforce lesson. (10 pts)
Good
Visuals relate to lesson. (8-9 pts)
Fair
Visuals rarely support lesson. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Visuals do not support the lesson. (0-4 pts)
Total
Mechanics
Excellent
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. (10 pts)
Good
Presentation as no more than 2 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (8-9 pts)
Fair
Presentation has 3-5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Presentation has more than 5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (0-4 pts)
Total
Eye Contact
Excellent
Presenter maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. (10 pts)
Good
Presenter maintains eye contact most of the time, but frequently returns to notes. (8-9 pts)
Fair
Presenter occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of notes. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Presenter read all of notes with no eye contact. (0-4 pts)
Total
Elocution
Excellent
Presenter uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that students hear and understand instructions. (10 pts)
Good
Presenter uses a clear voice and pronounces most words correctly. (8-9 pts)
Fair
Presenter uses a low voice and/or incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience has difficulty hearing presentation. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Presenter mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms and speaks too quietly for students to hear. (0-4 pts)
Total
Handouts & Rubric
Excellent
Handouts provide information and clear instructions need for students to complete given task and sets up expectations and guidelines. Rubric has been developed to cover the criteria required by the students. All student projects are graded fairly using the rubric.(15 pts)
Good
Handouts provide information and instructions. Sets up some expectations and guidelines, but some are not clear. Rubric has been developed to cover most of the criteria required by the students and/or student projects are graded fairly using the rubric. (8-14 pts)
Fair
Handouts provide some information and some expectations, but they are not clear. Rubric has been developed but doesn't cover the criteria required by the students. (5-7 pts)
Poor
No handouts are provided or they do not give expectations and/or rubric was not developed.(0-4 pts)
Total
Student responsibility
Excellent
There is evidence that student had a clear role and met 110% of responsibilites. Went over and above. (15 pts)
Good
There is evidence that student had a clear role and met 80-100% of responsibilities. (8-14 pts)
Fair
There is evidence that student met 60-79% of responsibilities. (5-7 pts)
Poor
Student did little to help group and someone else had to pick up the slack. (0-4 pts)
Total
Ontime
Excellent
Ontime - February 5th
Good
Late - Turned in on February 6th (less 10 points
Fair
Late - Turned in February 7-10 (less 15 points)
Poor
Late - Turned in February 13 or later (less 20 points)
Total
Subjects:
Math
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Math rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.