Skip to main content
iRubric: Teaching a Math Lesson rubric

iRubric: Teaching a Math Lesson rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Teaching a Math Lesson 
Rubric Code: V6A9W9
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Teaching
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Total

(N/A)

Organization

Excellent

Lesson is presented in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Has all the parts of the lesson - essential question, warm up, mini-lesson, work session and closing. 15 pts)
Good

Lesson is presented in logical sequence which audience can follow. Has all the parts of the lesson, but not presented in order. (8-14 pts)
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because group jumps around. Is missing one part of the lesson. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. Is missing 2 or more parts of the lesson. (0-4 pts)
Total
Math Content/Knowledge

Excellent

Group demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions and explanations and elaboration. (15 pts.)
Good

Group is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. (8-14 pts)
Fair

Group is uncomfortable with information is able to answer only rudimentary questions. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Group does not have grasp of information; cannot answer questions about subject. (0-4 pts)
Total
Visuals

Excellent

Visuals explain and reinforce lesson. (10 pts)
Good

Visuals relate to lesson. (8-9 pts)
Fair

Visuals rarely support lesson. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Visuals do not support the lesson. (0-4 pts)
Total
Mechanics

Excellent

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. (10 pts)
Good

Presentation as no more than 2 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (8-9 pts)
Fair

Presentation has 3-5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Presentation has more than 5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (0-4 pts)
Total
Eye Contact

Excellent

Presenter maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. (10 pts)
Good

Presenter maintains eye contact most of the time, but frequently returns to notes. (8-9 pts)
Fair

Presenter occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of notes. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Presenter read all of notes with no eye contact. (0-4 pts)
Total
Elocution

Excellent

Presenter uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that students hear and understand instructions. (10 pts)
Good

Presenter uses a clear voice and pronounces most words correctly. (8-9 pts)
Fair

Presenter uses a low voice and/or incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience has difficulty hearing presentation. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Presenter mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms and speaks too quietly for students to hear. (0-4 pts)
Total
Handouts & Rubric

Excellent

Handouts provide information and clear instructions need for students to complete given task and sets up expectations and guidelines. Rubric has been developed to cover the criteria required by the students. All student projects are graded fairly using the rubric.(15 pts)
Good

Handouts provide information and instructions. Sets up some expectations and guidelines, but some are not clear. Rubric has been developed to cover most of the criteria required by the students and/or student projects are graded fairly using the rubric. (8-14 pts)
Fair

Handouts provide some information and some expectations, but they are not clear. Rubric has been developed but doesn't cover the criteria required by the students. (5-7 pts)
Poor

No handouts are provided or they do not give expectations and/or rubric was not developed.(0-4 pts)
Total
Student responsibility

Excellent

There is evidence that student had a clear role and met 110% of responsibilites. Went over and above. (15 pts)
Good

There is evidence that student had a clear role and met 80-100% of responsibilities. (8-14 pts)
Fair

There is evidence that student met 60-79% of responsibilities. (5-7 pts)
Poor

Student did little to help group and someone else had to pick up the slack. (0-4 pts)
Total
Ontime

Excellent

Ontime - February 5th
Good

Late - Turned in on February 6th (less 10 points
Fair

Late - Turned in February 7-10 (less 15 points)
Poor

Late - Turned in February 13 or later (less 20 points)
Total




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232