Skip to main content
iRubric: Writing Assignments for Event Management rubric

iRubric: Writing Assignments for Event Management rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing Assignments for Event Management 
Writing Assignments for Hospitality students - v3
This rubric is to be used when assessing INDIVIDUAL assignments for undergrad/diploma level students
Rubric Code: V6783A
By cwittke
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
%
  Poor

None/very little
Missing parts
Flawed rationale
Lacks logic

1 pts

Fair

Some attempts show progress
Logical in some parts
Rationale is accurate in some parts

2 pts

Good

Most or All/Follows what was taught in class
Very little original thinking but classroom learning is applied with accuracy

3 pts

Excellent

All/Above and Beyond/Original thinking

4 pts

Content & Development - thoroughnes
%

This refers to the the thoroughness of included information in the assignment as required by the outline.

/20
Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or missing and/ or persuasive.
Fair

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Some Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good
Excellent

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Required Responses - Depth
%

This refers to how comprehensive the student(s) responses are to all questions.

/20
Poor

Missing some answers to questions OR very little detail or original thinking shown.
Most information is flawed or incorrect.
Fair

Some questions are answered - but there are many areas lacking any depth of detail or showing thinking - responses do not show any original thinking or ideas and student does not follow process/information taught in class.
Good

Some questions are answered - but there are areas lacking any depth of thinking - responses may not show original thinking or ideas and student sometimes follows process/information taught in class.
Excellent

All questions are answered - in depth and thoughtful/reflective
- appliation of learning from within the classroom is expanded and uses some original thinking
Accuracy of answers
%

This refers to the five main questions

/40
Poor

Assignment criteria is not mentioned or does not make sense based on the content of the outline and requirements of the assignment
Not done/included
Format difficult to uNot included or not a realistic choice understand
Fair

Ideas may work but not best choice
Format included but is flawed
Some errors or flaws in recommendation
- seems to be generic/not customized to demographic and group
Good
Excellent

Application of program learning
Answers show creativity and customization - recognizes outline/scenario and expands on requirements
Organization & Structure
%

This refers to the overall paper and how it "flows"

/10
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Introduction is missing or, if provided, does not preview major points.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Good
Excellent

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow (layout and design)
- Introduction provides clear background on the topic and previews major points.
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Format, grammar, punctuation
%

This refers to the overall professionalism and attention to details.

/10
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting.
- Citations and references are not provided.
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair

- Paper follows most guidelines.
- Paper provides citations, but they are incorrectly prepared.
- Paper provides reference list, with some errors or omissions.
- Paper is over/ under word length.
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Some application of terminology
Excellent

- Paper follows designated guidelines.
- Citations and references are used appropriately.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Correct appliation of industry terminology through-out paper.
Language is consistent and strong through the paper
Overall Impression
%

This refers to the over-all "first impression" of the professionalism and quality of the assignment submitted
Poor

Appears to be
a lack of attention to detail, time spent. care/quality
Fair

Some errors but overall good effort shown
Good
Excellent

Attention to details shows and content reflects weight of assignment






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202