iRubric: Ecosystem Diorama rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Ecosystem Diorama Rubric Code: V5W7A4 By traceyharros Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Ecosystem Diorama
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Quality of Construction	Poor The diorama was put together sloppily. Items appear to be just "slapped on." Pieces may be loose or hanging over the edges. Smudges, stains, and/ or stray marks are evident.	Fair The diorama shows some attention to construction. Most items are neatly trimmed and securely attached. A few barely noticeable stray marks, smudges or glue stains are present.	Good The diorama shoe incredible attention to construction.The items are neatly trimmed and carefully secured. There are no stray marks, smudges or glue stains.
Creativity	Poor The student did not make or customize any items on the diorama.	Fair One or two of the objects used in the diorama reflect student creativity in their creation and/or display.	Good Several of the objects used in the diorama reflect an exceptional degree of student creativity in their creation and/or display.
Presentation	Poor Ecosystem is named and explained somewhat. Presentation is missing 2-3/4 of the elements needed. (physical characteristics, organisms, environmental changes, effects by humans)	Fair Ecosystem is named and explained. Presentation is missing 1/4 of the elements needed.(physical characteristics, organisms, environmental changes, effects by humans)	Good Ecosystem is named and described well. All elements are presented to class.
Food Web	Poor One or none of the parts of the food web was explained in the presentation. No explaination of how changes in the food web affect the ecosystem.	Fair Food web was explained but did explain how changes in the food web affect the ecosystem.	Good All parts of the food web were included along with an explanation of how changes in the food web affect the ecosystem.
Partner Work	Poor Did not work well with partner. Frequent arguments and/or playing around occured. Did not work toward problem solving.	Fair Worked well with partner most of the time. Minimal arguments and/or playing around. Worked some to problem solve.	Good Worked well with partner all the time. No arguments and/or playing around. Worked well to problem solve.