Skip to main content
iRubric: Ensayo Argumentativo rubric

iRubric: Ensayo Argumentativo rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ensayo Argumentativo 
Rubric Code: V44WA8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Instructor Review
  Good

10 pts

Fair

5 pts

Needs Improvement

2 pts

Enter Title

(N/A)

Introduction

Good

The introduction contains an attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.
Fair

The introduction contains some attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.
Needs Improvement

The introduction has few if any attention-grabbing statements and/or the attention-grabbing statements do not clearly lead to the thesis statement/topic.
Enter Title
Thesis Statement

Good

The thesis statement clearly and concisely presents the topic and how it will be presented.

The thesis statement is placed correctly.
Fair

The thesis statement is vague in how it presents the topic and/or how it will be presented.

The thesis statement may not be placed correctly.
Needs Improvement

There is no clear thesis statement.
Enter Title
Adding Personality

(Voice)

Good

The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
Fair

The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
Needs Improvement

The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
Enter Title
Body: Focus & Support

Good

Each body paragraph contains a definite topic sentence with sufficient supporting details that clearly support the thesis statement and assignment.
Fair

Each body paragraph has a topic sentence with some details that support the thesis statement and assignment.
Needs Improvement

The paragraphs do not contain a topic sentence and/or contains a random collection of information that does not support the thesis statement and assignment.
Enter Title
Sequencing & Organization

Good

Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.

The essay includes five distinct paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion.
Fair

Some details may not be in a logical order or expected order, and this distracts the reader.

The essay includes five paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion; however, they may not be clearly presented.
Needs Improvement

Many details are not in a logical order or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized and/or the essay does not include five paragraphs.
Enter Title
Transitions

(Organization)

Good

A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how the ideas are connected.
Fair

Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are unclear.
Needs Improvement

The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.
Enter Title
Support for the Topic

(Content)

Good

At least 2-3 pieces of specific, complex, and thoroughly examined evidence are used. Evidence is quoted, summarized, or paraphrased, and clearly supports the writer's argument.
Fair

At least 2 pieces of evidence are included, but they are not thoroughly explained or examined. Evidence may not be specific and/or does not support the writer's argument/thesis statement.
Needs Improvement

Writer does not include at least 2 pieces of textual evidence. The evidence is not specific; it is simple and not fully explored. Evidence does not support the writer's argument/thesis.

There may be too much evidence (citations) and not enough arguments.
Enter Title
Conclusion

Good
Fair
Needs Improvement
Enter Title
Argument

(Support)

Good

The writer clearly states his or her position. Writer's argument is thoughtful, complex and thoroughly explained.
The purpose for the argument is clear.
Fair

The writer states the argument. Argument is somewhat developed.
The argument may not be as focused as it needs to be, causing the writer's argument to be somewhat weak; and purpose is not always clear.
Needs Improvement

The writer's stance on the argument is not clear. The argument is simple and not explained adequately.
The argument is not focused and/or includes contradictory information, entirely weakening the writer's argument. The purpose is questionable.

May include too many quotes, paraphrases, and/or summaries that make the argument weak or unclear.
Enter Title
Mechanics

(Grammar & Word Choice)

Good

The writer demonstrates proper use of vocabulary that adds to the quality of writing and enhances the overall meaning of the topic.

Very few minor mechanical errors.
Fair

The writer occasionally demostrates proper word choices that add to the quality of writing and enhance the overall meaning of the topic.

Some minor mechanical errors.
Needs Improvement

The writer rarely demostrates proper word choices, causing the reader to become distracted from the topic.

Several major mechanical errors.
Enter Title



Keywords:
  • ComposiciĆ³n avanzada


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178