Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Ensayo Argumentativo rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Ensayo Argumentativo
Argument Essay
Rubric Code:
V44WA8
By
mcastillo26
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Instructor Review
Good
10 pts
Fair
5 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Enter Title
(N/A)
Introduction
Good
The introduction contains an attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.
Fair
The introduction contains some attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.
Needs Improvement
The introduction has few if any attention-grabbing statements and/or the attention-grabbing statements do not clearly lead to the thesis statement/topic.
Enter Title
Thesis Statement
Good
The thesis statement clearly and concisely presents the topic and how it will be presented.
The thesis statement is placed correctly.
Fair
The thesis statement is vague in how it presents the topic and/or how it will be presented.
The thesis statement may not be placed correctly.
Needs Improvement
There is no clear thesis statement.
Enter Title
Adding Personality
(Voice)
Good
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
Fair
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
Needs Improvement
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
Enter Title
Body: Focus & Support
Good
Each body paragraph contains a definite topic sentence with sufficient supporting details that clearly support the thesis statement and assignment.
Fair
Each body paragraph has a topic sentence with some details that support the thesis statement and assignment.
Needs Improvement
The paragraphs do not contain a topic sentence and/or contains a random collection of information that does not support the thesis statement and assignment.
Enter Title
Sequencing & Organization
Good
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
The essay includes five distinct paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion.
Fair
Some details may not be in a logical order or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
The essay includes five paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion; however, they may not be clearly presented.
Needs Improvement
Many details are not in a logical order or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized and/or the essay does not include five paragraphs.
Enter Title
Transitions
(Organization)
Good
A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how the ideas are connected.
Fair
Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are unclear.
Needs Improvement
The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.
Enter Title
Support for the Topic
(Content)
Good
At least 2-3 pieces of specific, complex, and thoroughly examined evidence are used. Evidence is quoted, summarized, or paraphrased, and clearly supports the writer's argument.
Fair
At least 2 pieces of evidence are included, but they are not thoroughly explained or examined. Evidence may not be specific and/or does not support the writer's argument/thesis statement.
Needs Improvement
Writer does not include at least 2 pieces of textual evidence. The evidence is not specific; it is simple and not fully explored. Evidence does not support the writer's argument/thesis.
There may be too much evidence (citations) and not enough arguments.
Enter Title
Conclusion
Good
Fair
Needs Improvement
Enter Title
Argument
(Support)
Good
The writer clearly states his or her position. Writer's argument is thoughtful, complex and thoroughly explained.
The purpose for the argument is clear.
Fair
The writer states the argument. Argument is somewhat developed.
The argument may not be as focused as it needs to be, causing the writer's argument to be somewhat weak; and purpose is not always clear.
Needs Improvement
The writer's stance on the argument is not clear. The argument is simple and not explained adequately.
The argument is not focused and/or includes contradictory information, entirely weakening the writer's argument. The purpose is questionable.
May include too many quotes, paraphrases, and/or summaries that make the argument weak or unclear.
Enter Title
Mechanics
(Grammar & Word Choice)
Good
The writer demonstrates proper use of vocabulary that adds to the quality of writing and enhances the overall meaning of the topic.
Very few minor mechanical errors.
Fair
The writer occasionally demostrates proper word choices that add to the quality of writing and enhance the overall meaning of the topic.
Some minor mechanical errors.
Needs Improvement
The writer rarely demostrates proper word choices, causing the reader to become distracted from the topic.
Several major mechanical errors.
Enter Title
Keywords:
ComposiciĆ³n avanzada
Subjects:
English
Foreign Languages
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.