Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Podcast Diaries | Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Podcast Diaries | Presentation
Presentation - Research & Presentation
15-minute presentation
Rubric Code:
V2XB727
By
Zanrereed
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
The Podcast Diaries | Presentation
10 %
Excellent
8 pts
Good
6 pts
Fair
4 pts
Poor
2 pts
Effort
10 %
Excellent
Student shows impeccable evidence of having had listened to episode of the podcast, extensive time invested in preparation, general contextual research and creative execution.
Good
Student shows evidence of a good amount of time spent in preparation, research and creative execution.
Fair
Student appears to have spent a fair amount of time in preparation, research and creative execution.
Poor
Questionable evidence of preparation, research and creative execution.
Organization and Structure
10 %
Excellent
Student presents information in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Good
Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Fair
Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps from idea to idea.
Poor
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information
Graphics
5 %
Excellent
Student uses graphics that enhance audience understanding and interest of the topic.
Good
Student uses graphics that
enhance audience understanding of the topic.
Fair
Student uses graphics that do not enhance audience understanding of the topic.
Poor
Student does not use any graphics.
Verbal Skills
10 %
Excellent
Student speaks with great fluctuation in
volume and inflection to
maintain audience interest
and emphasize key points.
Good
Student speaks with some fluctuation in
volume and inflection to
maintain audience interest
and emphasize key points.
Fair
Student speaks with little fluctuation in
volume and inflection to
maintain audience interest
and emphasize key points.
Poor
Student speaks with no fluctuation in
volume and inflection to
maintain audience interest
and emphasize key points.
Subject Knowledge
15 %
Excellent
Student demonstrates full knowledge, applying concepts covered in the course and answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Good
Student demonstrates some knowledge by integrating some concepts covered in the course and answering most questions with explanation and elaboration.
Fair
Student demonstrates little knowledge and answers few questions with explanation and elaboration.
Poor
Student demonstrates no knowledge by answering questions without explanation and elaboration.
Personal Analysis
10 %
Excellent
Student effectively applies personal critical analysis to the podcast's production, deconstructing contextual, structural, and semantic categories through the filter of their personal interpretation and way of seeing.
Good
Student applies a personal analysis sharing their opinions and observations of the audio construction by touching on contextual, structural and semantic categories.
Fair
Student applies a fair measure of analysis but lacks robust critical and personal interpretation of the work pertaining to contextual, structural and semantic categories.
Poor
Student's analysis is generally poor or nonexistent, mostly applying the semantic category and simply giving a summary of the content of the podcast.
Participation in class discussion
10 %
Excellent
The student actively contributes in the discussion and analysis of the podcast after their colleague has presented and brings new ideas to the table, demonstrating a close listening to the podcast under discussion.
Good
The student contributes in the discussion of the podcast after their colleague has presented and brings ideas to the table, demonstrating that they have listened to the podcast under discussion.
Fair
The student contributes in the discussion of the podcast when probed by the lecturer and shows evidence of having had listened to the podcasts under discussion.
Poor
The student is reluctant to participate in the discussions and shows little evidence of having had listened to the podcast under discussion.
Written Essay
20 %
Excellent
The text demonstrates a cogent analyses of the podcast under discussion, including proof of empirical observation (research), close/broad listening of the episode and personal interpretation. Three in text references and bibliography are perfectly achieved.
Good
The text demonstrates a good analyses of the podcast under discussion, including proof of empirical observation (research), listening and personal interpretation of the audio construction. Three in text references and bibliography are achieved.
Fair
The text demonstrates a fair analyses of the podcast under discussion, however research and personal interpretation could be more robust. Less than three in text references are included and bibliography has some errors.
Poor
The text demonstrates a poor analyses of the podcast under discussion, showing little evidence of research and personal interpretation. No text references and bibliography are included.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.