Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: OSHA Summary rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
OSHA Summary
Summary Paper
Use this rubric to successfully complete your OSHA summary.
Rubric Code:
V2W558A
By
tqbrockington
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Summary Paper
Exemplary/Excellent
4 pts
Accomplished/Good
3 pts
Developing/Fair
2 pts
Beginning/Unacceptable
1 pts
Content
Exemplary/Excellent
All relevant papers are reviewed, from seminal early works to the latest current developments. The articles reviewed are clearly inter-related and build upon each other to show how we have progressed to the current state-of-the-art.
Accomplished/Good
A good general review of the literature is included, covering most of the seminal early papers and the most relevant current papers. Papers reviewed are cohesive and inter-related.
Developing/Fair
Articles reviewed had some relation to each other and to the chosen topic. Keyword search may need to be refined.
Beginning/Unacceptable
Research articles reviewed are scattered and unrelated. Student clearly did not filter out irrelevant articles and instead summarized the top "web hits".
Organization
Exemplary/Excellent
Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose of the paper. Paragraphs contain one topic sentence, and supporting sentences clearly flow from one to the other. Paragraphs also are clearly linked to each other. The reader can easily follow the paper.
Accomplished/Good
Writing is logically organized to support the central purpose. Paragraphs contain only one main idea, with each paragraph supporting the others. The reader can follow the structure of the paper and understands the writer's intentions.
Developing/Fair
In general, writing is logically organized. Occasionally paragraphs contain more than one main idea or contain sentences unrelated to the main idea. Some support and flow among paragraphs. Reader has a fairly clear idea of what the writer intends.
Beginning/Unacceptable
Writing is not logically organized. Paragraphs lack topic sentences and may contain more than one major idea. Paragraphs and sentences do not support each other.
Sentence Structure
Exemplary/Excellent
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. They flow smoothly from one to another.
Accomplished/Good
Sentences are well-phrased and there is some variety in length and structure. Flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth.
Developing/Fair
Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted.
Beginning/Unacceptable
Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader
Grammar, spelling, punctuation
Exemplary/Excellent
Writing is free or almost free of errors.
Accomplished/Good
There are occasional errors, but they are not too distracting and do not obscure the meaning of the sentence.
Developing/Fair
Paper has many distracting errors. Perhaps some editing did occur.
Beginning/Unacceptable
There are so many errors the meaning is obscured. Student obviously did not proof read the paper at all.
Use of References
Exemplary/Excellent
Compelling evidence from legitimate sources are given. Attribution is clear and fairly represented. References are cited appropriately throughout the text. List of references at the end follow a consistent format.
Accomplished/Good
Professionally legitimate sources are generally present and attribution is, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. Student made a good effort at citing sources. Most references are cited properly and list of sources at the end are mostly consistent.
Developing/Fair
Although attributions are occasionally given, many statements seem unsubstantiated. Sources of information are unclear. Sections where references are needed are not cited and the list of sources at the end are incomplete.
Beginning/Unacceptable
Student failed to cite sources. Very few references given throughout paper, even though the content clearly did not originate from the student. No sources were cited throughout the paper and list of sources at the end are not formatted and/or incomplete.
Keywords:
technical writing, literature review, science, engineering, tech
Subjects:
Engineering
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.