iRubric: Mousetrap Car Construct Check rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Mousetrap Car Construct Check The student's mousetrap car construction will be graded in accordance with the catagories below Rubric Code: V29AA7 By terryo Draft Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Flight check
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Car Base	Excellent All edges are cut neatly and the base is symetrical.	Good most edges are cut neatly and the base is symetrical.	Fair Some edges are cut neatly and the base is somewhat symetrical.	Poor Few edges are cut neatly and the base is not symetrical.
Wheel and axle	Excellent All wheels and axles are balanced and roll with little resistance	Good All wheels and axles are somewhat balanced and roll with some resistance	Fair All wheels and axles are not very balanced and roll with some resistance	Poor All wheels and axles are not at all balanced and roll with great resistance
Neatness of assembly	Excellent All pieces fit together well and there is no excess glue.	Good Most pieces fit together well and there is little excess glue.	Fair Some pieces fit together well and there is little excess glue.	Poor Few pieces fit together well and there is no excess glue.
Model structure	Excellent Car is put together so that all of the parts are balanced	Good Car is put together so that most of the parts are balanced	Fair Car is put together so that some of the parts are balanced	Poor Car is put together so that few of the parts are balanced
Built to specifications	Excellent Car built so that all of the constraints are followed	Good Car built so that most of the constraints are followed	Fair Car built so that some of the constraints are followed	Poor Car built to so that few of the constraints are followed
Behavior	Excellent Student was on task all days and did not require redirection	Good Student was on task most days and require little redirection	Fair Student was on task few days and require much redirection	Poor Student was never on task and required constant redirection
Participation	Excellent Student worked diligently to advance the construction of the project	Good The student did much to advance the construction of the project	Fair The student did little to advance the construction of the project	Poor The student did nothing to advance the construction of the project