Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: 6 traits writing rubric, peer conference
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
6 traits writing rubric, peer conference
6 traits writing rubric, peer conference
Six traits rubric used for peer conference in writing.
Rubric Code:
V28WCC
By
tengland
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
6-Trait Writing Rubric
Just Beginning
1 pts
On the Way
2 pts
Halfway Home
3 pts
Almost There
4 pts
Ready to Share
5 pts
Ready to Publish
6 pts
Peer Comments
(N/A)
Ideas:
Just Beginning
The author didn't know what the topic of this paper was supposed to be.
On the Way
This paper doesn't focus on one topic or subject. (The ideas do not relate to each other.)
Halfway Home
This paper is about one topic or subject but the details are not specific enough to support this topic or subject.
Almost There
This paper focuses on one topic and uses a lot of great details, but some details don't belong .
Ready to Share
This paper holds the readers' attention. The ideas focus on one topic or subject and there are several examples to support these ideas.
Ready to Publish
This paper grabs the reader's attention and holds it for the whole time. The ideas and details all focus around one topic. The details support the topic and enhance the paper. When I finished reading this paper, I wanted to read it all over again.
Peer Comments
Organization:
Just Beginning
This paper has no organization at all. This author may not have planned this paper at all.
On the Way
This paper lacks a clear sense of direction. The ideas, details, or events are strung together in a loose or random fashion.
Halfway Home
This paper has a beginning middle and end. This paper may not have any transitions (sentence starters) to make it clear that I am going from one idea to another.
Almost There
This paper has a beginning, middle and end with transitions. It is smooth to read, but may not always be that interesting.
Ready to Share
This paper is organized so it highlights its ideas and subjects. (The organization in this paper makes it even more interesting.)
Ready to Publish
This paper is organized so that it highlights its ideas and subjects. Its transitions make it very smooth to read.
Peer Comments
Voice:
Just Beginning
This paper doesn't reflect a personal connection. (The author did not relate to the topic) The author's writing doesn't involve the reader/audience.
On the Way
This author tried to relate to the topic of paper, but did not succeed. The author does not put any of his own personality into this paper.
Halfway Home
The author makes a sincere attempt to engage the reader/audience. (The result is pleasant) But the paper is not interesting or compelling.
Almost There
The author engages the reader in this paper. But the paper feels like anyone could have written it.
Ready to Share
The author of this paper speaks directly to the reader/audience. (This paper is interesting, compelling, and engaging.)
Ready to Publish
My reading this paper, I can tell exactly who wrote it. Their personality comes through. They engage the reader in an interesting way.
Peer Comments
Word Choice:
Just Beginning
The author of this paper used little or no sentence starters. This paper is lacking vivid words.
On the Way
The author of this paper used one or two sentence starters on a couple of sentences, but then forgot to use them anywhere else. The author of this paper used one or two vivid words.
Halfway Home
The author of this paper used sentences starters, but used the same ones many times. The author attempted to use vivid words, but these words still lack energy.
Almost There
The author of this paper used many different sentence starters, but some may be used incorrectly or may seem to stiff in this paper. The author used many vivid words to make the paper seem more interesting.
Ready to Share
The author of this paper used sentence starters and vivid words correctly. The words the author used help to convey the intended message in a precise, and natural way. (Reader picks up the energy and is interested)
Ready to Publish
When I read this paper, I can tell that the author thought about every word that he/she used. Each word is used in order to make the paper more interesting. The sentence starters are all different and are used correctly.
Peer Comments
Sentence Fluency:
Just Beginning
Most of the sentences in this paper are not really sentences at all. They are simply unrelated words stuck together.
On the Way
These simple sentences are choppy and the reader/audience can not follow the ideas with fluency.
Halfway Home
These sentences are longer but all the same length. The reader/audience still can not read this piece with fluency. (The paper needs more rhythm.)
Almost There
The author started to use sentences of different lengths but they are not well built. (The subjects and verbs may not agree. There may be incomplete sentences or run-ons)
Ready to Share
The author wrote a paper with good rhythm. Sentences are well built, and of varying lengths.
Ready to Publish
I can tell that the author of this paper thought about how each sentence sounded in this paper. The sentences are of different lengths and are well built. There are no run-ons or incomplete sentences.
Peer Comments
Conventions:
Just Beginning
I can find at least one spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, or usage error in nearly every sentence of this paper. This paper is nearly impossible to read.
On the Way
The errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar & usage; make this paper difficult to read.
Halfway Home
The author of this paper wrote using conventions which enhance readability; but at other times, errors are distracting and impair readability.
Almost There
The author of this paper wrote using conventions which enhance readability; There are only a 3-4 errors in this paper, but they do not detract from the meaning of the paper.
Ready to Share
The author of this paper wrote using conventions which enhance readability; There are only a 1-2 errors in this paper, but they do not detract from the meaning of the paper.
Ready to Publish
The author wrote a paper which reflects a good grasp of standard writing conventions. (The use of correct conventions enhances readability.)
Peer Comments
Keywords:
6+1 Trait writing, Kid-friendly statements, standards
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.