Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation
Sport Management (T & P) Research Paper & Presentation
Assessment rubric for graduate students' Budget Project and Class Presentation in Sport Management
Rubric Code:
V285WB
By
eatkinson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Physical Ed., Fitness
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Sport Manage. Budget Prep & Present
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Average
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Budget Preparation/Research/Project
Excellent
Budget preparation , reseach, and project were excellently done
Very Good
Budget preparation , reseach, and project were very good
Average
Budget preparation , reseach, and project were average and met standard norms
Poor
Budget preparation , reseach, and project were at the beginning level of performance
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Appearance/ Poise
Excellent
Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence
Very Good
Appearance and poise were professional
Average
Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms
Poor
Appearance not professional and presenter not poised
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Depth of Project / Purpose
Excellent
Depth of project and purpose were excellently executed
Very Good
Depth of project and purpose were very well executed
Average
Depth of project and purpose were average and met standard norms
Poor
Depth of project and purpose were at beginning level of performance
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Technological Execution
Excellent
Technological execution was execellently demonstrated
Very Good
Technological execution was very good
Average
Technological execution was average and met standard noms
Poor
Technological execution was at beginning level
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content
Excellent
Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident
Very Good
Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content
Average
Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms
Poor
Knowledge and content at beginning level
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Presentation/ Delivery Style
Excellent
Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture
Very Good
Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good
Average
Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms
Poor
Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts)
Excellent
Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology
Very Good
Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed
Average
Creativity in presentation was average and met standard norms
Poor
Lacks creativity
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Organization/ Flow/ Time
Excellent
Organizational skills, flow of the presentation, project, time execution were excellent
Very Good
Organizational skills, flow of presentation, project, time utilization were very good
Average
Presentation, project organization, flow, time utilization were average and met standard norms
Poor
Presentation, project were poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations
Excellent
Finish, conclusions, recommendations were excellent and superbly executed
Very Good
Finish, conclusions, recomendations were greatly evident and very good
Average
Finish, conclusions, recomendations were average and met standard norms
Poor
Finish, conclusions, recommendations were at begining level
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Assignment Execution
Excellent
Assignment execution was excellent
Very Good
Assignemnt was very well executed
Average
Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms
Poor
Assignment performance was executed at beginning level
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Keywords:
Research, sport managment, thoeries, principles, project
Subjects:
Physical Ed., Fitness
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Physical Ed., Fitness rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.