Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ZOO Presentation - 7th Grade rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ZOO Presentation - 7th Grade
AP Biology Presentation Rubric
This purpose of this presentation was to become familiar with presenting scientific data to an audience.
Rubric Code:
V24WA64
By
hwcameron
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Geology
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Presentation
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Slides
Excellent
The slides contained all of the following properties:
1) The title slide was distinct from the rest of the slide.
2) No sentences on the slides other than data. Unless needed for impact.
3) One chart/figure at a time per slide to minimize confusion
4) Slide was annotated in a clear, professional manner
Good
The slides contained most of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair
The slides contained some of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor
The slides contained few of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Content
Excellent
1) The project included all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion.
2) Material was presented accurately and in an appropriately detailed fashion.
3) All Habitat Research is mentioned with additional info.
4) References for information is posted
Good
Project included all relevant information; however, it was not well-organized. Some of the details were missing.
Fair
Did not have all of the relevant information of the poster. There was not enough information presented. Information was presented in an unorganized/inaccurate fashion
Poor
The presentation was lacking elements required. There were many gaps in information presented.
Organization
Excellent
The presentation contained all of the following properties:
1) The title slide was descriptive and contained the name of the presenter with the date.
2) Slide transition was smooth and timely.
3) The presentation flowed in a logical manner (Intro --> Results --> Conclusion)
4) A summary slide was presented
Good
The slides contained most of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair
The slides contained some of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor
The slides contained few of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Time management
Excellent
The presentation was within the 3 - 5 min allotted time frame.
Good
The presentation was within 3 minute, the minimum allotted time frame.
Fair
The presentation was 2 min. or less than 2 minute of the allotted time frame.
Poor
Presentation/interaction
Excellent
The presenter:
1) Spoke loudly and clearly.
2) Spoke with cadence (not monotone).
3) Faced the audience.
4) Engaged the audience (looked up and at people in the audience).
5) Was not distracting the audience (swinging arms, smacking gum, etc.)
6. Each member spoke during the Presentation approximately equal amounts.
Good
The presenter followed no more than 4 of the points outlined in the 4 pt column.
Fair
The presenter followed no more than 3 of the points outlined in the 4 pt column.
Poor
The presenter followed no more than 2 of the points outlined in the 4 pt column.
Work quality/effort
Excellent
The work done was excellent. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation and making understandable to the audience.
Good
The work was done with good effort. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation.
Fair
Work was done with fair effort. It was evident that the work was rushed.
Poor
Work was done with little effort. It was evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
First 6 requirements met
Excellent
All 6 points required were met during the presentation
Good
Only 5 points required were met during the presentation
Fair
Only 4 points required were met during the presentation
Poor
3 or less points required were met during the presentation
Habitat Design
Excellent
1. Habitat design Made sense for that organism.
2. It is safe for the organism.
3. It provides proper distraction for the organism (What does the organism like to do; do they play with toys, etc.)
4. It allows for the viewing and entertaining of the paying customers.
5. It addressed issues with the current design.
6. It can be built at the current Zoo location.
(note: 2 points will be deducted without the script)
Good
Only 5 points required were met during the presentation
Fair
Only 4 points required were met during the presentation including need 11
Poor
Only 3 points required were met during the presentation including need 11
Keywords:
Zoology, Ethology, Anthropology (of the viewer)
Subjects:
Biology
Geology
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.