iRubric: Community Service Group Rubric

Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.

Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.

Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.

Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.

Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.

Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.

Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.

Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.

Presenters were all very confident in delivery and they did an excellent job of engaging the class. Preparation is very evident

Presenters were occasionally confident with their presentation however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been for the class.

Presenters were not consistent with the level of confidence they showed the classroom but had some strong moments.

Presenters were unconfident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation.

Group project and overall presentation included evaluation methods, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.

Group project and overall presentation included an evaluation method, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.

Group project included an evaluation method, along with documented efforts by individuals and the group.

Project included some efforts to evaluate the project effectiveness.