Skip to main content

iRubric: Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric Code: V24ABA5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Essay
Enter rubric description
  5

(N/A)

4

(N/A)

3

(N/A)

2

(N/A)

1

(N/A)

Score

(N/A)

Comprehension of Local and Oral History Concepts

5

Demonstrates an in-depth understanding of local and oral history, clearly explaining their significance, benefits, and challenges.
4

Demonstrates a good understanding of local and oral history, with some insight into their importance and challenges.
3

Demonstrates a basic understanding of local and oral history but lacks depth or clear insight into challenges or benefits.
2

Demonstrates a limited understanding of local and oral history, with incomplete or inaccurate explanations of key concepts.
1

Shows little to no understanding of local and oral history, with major misconceptions or missing explanations.
Score
Analysis and Critical Thinking

5

Thorough analysis that connects local history to national narratives, providing unique insights and perspectives.
4

Strong analysis connecting local history to broader narratives, though some insights could be expanded.
3

Basic analysis with some attempt to connect local history to broader contexts, but lacks depth or unique perspectives.
2

Limited analysis, with minimal or unclear connections between local and national histories.
1

No critical analysis or connections made between local and national histories.
Score
Use of Methodology (Oral History, Sources, etc).

5

Effective and innovative use of oral history methods or other sources, with a clear understanding of their role.
4

Appropriate use of oral history methods or sources, though lacking some depth in methodology application.
3

Basic use of oral history or sources, with limited engagement in methodology.
2

Incomplete or ineffective use of oral history methods or sources, with minimal understanding of their purpose.
1

No attempt to use oral history methods or relevant sources, or misuses methodology entirely.
Score
Clarity and Organization of Presentation

5

Presentation is clear, well-organized, and engaging, with a logical flow that supports comprehension.
4

Presentation is generally clear and organized, though it may lack some flow or engagement.
3

Presentation is somewhat clear, but organization is inconsistent, impacting understanding.
2

Presentation is unclear, disorganized, and lacks flow, making it difficult to follow.
1

Presentation is unclear and highly disorganized, with no logical structure.
Score
Reflection and Self-Assessment

5

Provides insightful reflection on the research process, including learning challenges and insights gained.
4

Provides a thoughtful reflection on the research process, though lacking some depth.
3

Reflection shows some insight into the research process but is largely surface-level.
2

Minimal reflection on the research process, with little insight into challenges or learning experiences.
1

No reflection on the research process, or lacks relevance to the project.
Score










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n79