Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Assignment: Global Players rubric

iRubric: Research Assignment: Global Players rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Assignment: Global Players 
This is a formal research assignment (4-5 pages of text) that asks complex questions about one of our three topics: Cities/Economies, Memory Cultures, or Sports and National Identity. From a critical/analytical perspective, you explore issues through the collection and analysis of evidence that results in informed conclusions or judgements. You use at least 3 sources and document in MLA format. You provide a separate "Works Cited" page.
Rubric Code: UXW347W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Rubric: Researchs Essay
20 %
  Very Good!

Advanced

10 pts

Good!

Intermediate

9 pts

Needs Revisions!

Novice

7 pts

Keep Going!

Emerging

5 pts

MLA format and citations
10 %

MLA style sheet is in your Logistics folder.

Very Good!

The student uses MLA format correctly and cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. In addition, student includes a Works Cited page that is formatted correctly.
Good!

The student uses MLA format correctly most of the time; cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. Works Cited page is, for the most part, formatted correctly.
Needs Revisions!

Some parts of MLA format are correct and some are not; quoted or paraphrased passages are cited but not cited correctly. Works Cited page is included but is formatted incorrectly.
Keep Going!

Student does not use correct MLA format and/or does not cite quoted or paraphrased passages; there may be evidence of plagiarism. No Works Cited page is included.
Grammar, Mechanics, and Spelling
10 %

Read your paper out aloud to someone. Acknowledge assistance with editing and proof reading.

Very Good!

There are few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar or spelling. The titles of the 3 works and evidence from the works are correctly integrated into the text.
Good!

There are some errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling. Most conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating and for quoting the title of the works and supplying evidence from the work are followed.
Needs Revisions!

There are several errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling. Only some of the MLA conventions for quoting and citing the 3 works are followed.
Keep Going!

There are many serious errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, and spelling. Few or none of the MLA conventions are followed.
Introduction/Thesis
30 %

Provide evidence of thoughtful construction of your introduction, thesis, and engage readers in how you approach issues or questions. Introduce your sources - let us know why and how the sources are important.

Very Good!

Intro engages the reader, introduces relevant questions or issues, and leads effectively to the thesis; thesis is clearly stated and exhibits analytical thinking, engagement with the topic, and complexity; relevant texts, authors,or web-based sources are referenced within first two paragraphs.
Good!

Intro leads reader to the thesis; thesis is clearly stated and contains a position and a rationale, but one or the other may not be effective; exhibits some analytical thinking, texts, authors, questions and issues referenced.
Needs Revisions!

Intro leads the reader to the thesis; thesis is present but lacks clarity and analytical thinking; texts and authors may be referenced.
Keep Going!

Intro fails to adequately tie into thesis; thesis is unclear and underdeveloped; texts, authors, and issues are not referenced.
Organization
20 %

Think carefully and edit for effective communication. Pay attention to sequence and transitions. Finish with a strong conclusion. Write 4-5 pages.

Very Good!

Essay begins with clear intro and thesis, paragraphs begin with topic sentences, relate back to the thesis, and contain appropriately organized quotes. Transitions are consistently used. Conclusion relates to thesis, but does not merely summarize. Page requirement is met.
Good!

Essay begins with intro and thesis, most supporting paragraphs relate to thesis, and sometimes offer textual support. Transitions are used but are sometimes abrupt. Conclusion sums up argument and connects to thesis. Page requirement is met.
Needs Revisions!

Essay begins with intro and thesis, supporting paragraphs list ideas presented in thesis. There are few quotes or quotes are incorrectly executed. Some transitions are used. Conclusion connects to thesis. Page requirement may have been met.
Keep Going!

Essay begins with intro, thesis is not clearly present. Paragraphs are not well developed; few/no quotes or textual references are included, or the textual evidence is irrelevant to the topic; conclusion does not connect to thesis. Page requirement may not have been met.
Analysis & Research
30 %

Think and write as a scholar. Ask questions. Go deep. Engage the sources.

Very Good!

Essay reflects a sophisticated understanding of economical, artistic, athletic, cultural, interpersonal, philosophical, or historical themes we explored on campus and abroad. Students communicate their deep understanding of the topic. Evidence and examples are consistently integrated and support the thesis and topic sentences. Student makes relevant connection between sources and demonstrates critical argumentation.
Good!

Essay reflects a solid understanding of economical, artistic, athletic, cultural, interpersonal, philosophical, or historical themes we explored on campus and abroad. Evidence and examples support the thesis and the topic sentence. Analysis is consistently provided although it may not always connect with the thesis.
Needs Revisions!

Essay reflects some understanding of economical, artistic, athletic, cultural, interpersonal, philosophical, or historical themes we explored on campus and abroad. Some examples are provided but they may not support the thesis or topic sentence. Essay is heavily dependent on summary. Analysis of source(s) may not connect with the thesis and may be obvious or repetitive.
Keep Going!

Essay reflects little to no understanding of economical, artistic, athletic, cultural, interpersonal, philosophical, or historical themes we explored on campus and abroad. Very little evidence or examples are provided, and there is little or no analysis of source(s).





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178